I looked up the question and got D- a vacuum
Answer:
1. The final velocity of the truck is 15 m/s
2. The distance travelled by the truck is 37.5 m
Explanation:
1. Determination of the final velocity
Initial velocity (u) = 0 m/s
Acceleration (a) = 3 m/s²
Time (t) = 5 s
Final velocity (v) =?
The final velocity of the truck can be obtained as follow:
v = u + at
v = 0 + (3 × 5)
v = 0 + 15
v = 15 m/s
Therefore, the final velocity of the truck is 15 m/s
2. Determination of the distance travelled
Initial velocity (u) = 0 m/s
Acceleration (a) = 3 m/s²
Time (t) = 5 s
Distance (s) =?
The distance travelled by the truck can be obtained as follow:
s = ut + ½at²
s = (0 × 5) + (½ × 3 × 5²)
s = 0 + (½ × 3 × 25)
s = 0 + 37.5
s = 37.5 m
Therefore, the distance travelled by the truck is 37.5 m
1 W = 1 J/s
Watt<span> is the unit of measure for power .
</span><span>
</span>Joule is the unit of measure for the energy and the second is the unit of measure for time.
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
