Remember that a conjugate acid-base pair will differ only by one proton.
None of the options you listed are conjugate acid-base pairs as none of them differ only by one proton (or H⁺)
An example of a conjugate acid-base pair would be NH₃ and NH₄⁺NH₃ + H₂O --> NH₄⁺ + OH⁻NH3 is the base, and NH₄⁺ is the conjugate acid
Answer:
The radius of the sun is 7x10^5 kilometers, and that of the Earth is about 6.4x10^3 kilometers. Use scientific notation to show that the Sun's radius is about 100 times the Earth's radius. The Sun's radius is 10^10 the Earth's radius.
No, it isn’t but it is a good heat conductor, metal is a good electricity conductor though
Ara Ara... well... hope this helps
This number in scientific notation is 5.089(10^6).
Answer:
- First choice: <em>The hypothesis is revised and another experiment is conducted. </em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
Citing myself from brainly.com/question/12687503, a hypothesis is a reasonable explanation of a phenomenon, which tries to relate a cause with an effect, and that can be testable.
The outcome of the test can either support the hypothesis or reject it.
Both results, either supporting or rejecting the hypothesis, are good for science and help to the development of the scientific knowledge.
Hence, the fact that the data from an experiment do not support the original hypothesis is not a bad thing. The same scientist or other from the scientific community will be able to revise the hypothesis and conduct another experiment, as the first answer choice proposes.
The data are supposed to be correct, unless the analysys, not the conclusion, suggests some errors in the measures or collection of the data. So, it is not the fact that the data do not support the original hypothesis what conducts to run the experiment again (second choice is wrong, then).
The revision of the data to support the hypothesis (third choice) or adjustment of the data to match the observations (fourth hypothesis) are contrary to good practices, so they are also discarded.
