Answer: Their weekly pay would be the same if xx equals $1,600
Step-by-step explanation: The first and most important step is to identify what the question requires, and that is, what is the value of the unknown in the equation of their weekly incomes that would make their pay to be the same? Their weekly pay as per individual is given as follows;
Khloe = 245 + 0.095x ———(1)
Emma = 285 + 0.07x ———(2)
Simply put, we need to find the value of x when equation (1) equals equation (2)
245 + 0.095x = 285 + 0.07x
Collect like terms and we now have
0.095x - 0.07x = 285 - 245
0.025x = 40
Divide both sides of the equation by 0.025
x = 1600
Therefore their weekly pay would be at the same level, if x equals $1600
Answer:
Brand 1 Brand 2 Difference
37734 35202 2532
45299 41635 3664
36240 35500 740
32100 31950 150
37210 38015 −805
48360 47800 560
38200 37810 390
33500 33215 285
Sum of difference = 2532+ 3664+740+150 −805+ 560 +390 +285 = 7516
Mean = 
Mean = 
a) d= 939.5


=1441.21
b)SD= 1441.21
c)Calculate a 99% two-sided confidence interval on the difference in mean life.
confidence level =99%
significance level =α= 0.01
Degree of freedom = n-1 = 8-1 =7
So, 
Formula for confidence interval 
Substitute the values
confidence interval 
confidence interval
to 
Confidence interval
to 
The two numbers are 12 and 16. 12 + 6 = 18. 6 doubled is 12. 12 plus 6 equals 18.
Answer:
The answer to your question is t = 1.3 s
Step-by-step explanation:
Data
Equation h(t) = -4.9t² + v₀t + h₀
v₀ = 0 m/s
h₀ = 8 m
t = ?
h = 0 m
Process
1.- Substitute the values in the formula
0 = -4.9t² + 0t + 8
2.- Simplification
0 = -4.9t² + 8
3.- Solve for t
4.9t² = 8
t² = 8/4.9
t² = 1.63
4.- Result
t = 1.27 ≈ 1.3 s
9514 1404 393
Answer:
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
Step-by-step explanation:
This inequality can be resolved to a compound inequality:
-7 ≤ (3x -5)/2 ≤ 7
Multiply all parts by 2.
-14 ≤ 3x -5 ≤ 14
Add 5 to all parts.
-9 ≤ 3x ≤ 19
Divide all parts by 3.
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
If you subtract 7 from both sides of the given inequality, it becomes ...
|(3x -5)/2| -7 ≤ 0
Then you're looking for the values of x that bound the region where the graph is below the x-axis. Those are shown in the attachment. For graphing purposes, I find this comparison to zero works well.
__
For an algebraic solution, I like the compound inequality method shown above. That only works well when the inequality is of the form ...
|f(x)| < (some number) . . . . or ≤
If the inequality symbol points away from the absolute value expression, or if the (some number) expression involves the variable, then it is probably better to write the inequality in two parts with appropriate domain specifications:
|f(x)| > g(x) ⇒ f(x) > g(x) for f(x) > 0; or -f(x) > g(x) for f(x) < 0
Any solutions to these inequalities must respect their domains.