<span>It is false that it is the obligation of researchers to review and comment on the research of other researchers. It is not their obligations - they don't have to do it, although they can if they want to and if they are allowed by the author him or herself. However, they are not bound by law or something like that to do this, it's just due to their kindness or genuine interest that they do this.</span>
Proton is the answer ur looking for. have a wonderful day :) !!
I'm guessing that the purpose of the article is to inform the
general public of the work that these Physicists did when they
attempted to detect the existence or non-existence of telepathy
in a controlled, scientifically acceptable setting.
The REASON the article was ever presented in a non-professional
publication was most likely in deference to the general public's interest
in telepathy, UFOs, aliens, flat Earth, Astrology, and all other forms of
weird garbage. In other words, its publication was motivated more by
the desire to sell magazines than by any inclination to impart any real,
useful information to the general public.
Sliding and Static.
Would be the right one here.
