EC_1 + EP_1 = EC2 + EP_2
EC_2 = 0
EC_2 = EP_1 - EP_2
EC_2 = mg(H_1 - H_2) = 0.20 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 * (3.25 m - 1.5m) = 3.43 J
If both bars are made of a good conductor, then their specific heat capacities must be different. If both are metals, specific heat capacities of different metals can vary by quite a bit, eg, both are in kJ/kgK, Potassium is 0.13, and Lithium is very high at 3.57 - both of these are quite good conductors.
If one of the bars is a good conductor and the other is a good insulator, then, after the surface application of heat, the temperatures at the surfaces are almost bound to be different. This is because the heat will be rapidly conducted into the body of the conducting bar, soon achieving a constant temperature throughout the bar. Whereas, with the insulator, the heat will tend to stay where it's put, heating the bar considerably over that area. As the heat slowly conducts into the bar, it will also start to cool from its surface, because it's so hot, and even if it has the same heat capacity as the other bar, which might be possible, it will eventually reach a lower, steady temperature throughout.
Answer:
The greater the amplitude the greater the energy.
(Think of a water wave - which carries greater energy a 1 ft wave or
a 10 ft wave)
Answer:
B) electrons transferred from sphere to rod.
(2) 1.248 x 10¹¹ electrons were transferred
Explanation:
Given;
initial charge on the plastic rod, q₁ = 15nC
final charge on the plastic rod, q₂ = - 5nC
let the charge acquired by the plastic rod = q
q + 15nC = -5nC
q = -5nC - 15nC
q = -20 nC
Thus, the plastic rod acquired excess negative charge from the metal sphere.
Hence, electrons transferred from sphere to rod
B) electrons transferred from sphere to rod.
2) How many charged particles were transferred?
1.602 x 10⁻¹⁹ C = 1 electron
20 x 10⁻⁹ C = ?
= 1.248 x 10¹¹ electrons
Thus,1.248 x 10¹¹ electrons were transferred
