<span>If you can't measure the parallax that means that the star is far far away, beyond all possible reach of humanity with its current technology. The closer the star is the greater the parallax, so you either get a bigger, more powerful telescope, or you just accept that it's too far away to be measured at all. Eventually the technology will develop enough to measure it.</span>
Answer:
31.8 m in the positive x-direction
Explanation:
Here we have an example of multiplication of a vector by a scalar.
In order to perform this operation, we have to:
- multiply the magnitude of the vector by the scalar
- reverse the direction of the vector if the scalar is a negative number
In this problem, the original vector has a lenght of 8.6 m and it points in the negative x direction. Now we have to find the vector -3.7A, so we have:
- The magnitude is obtained by calculating the product

- The direction is reversed, because the scalar is -3.7, so the new vector will point in the positive x-direction
So the final vector is 31.8 m in the positive x-direction, and therefore its x-component is also 31.8 m in the positive direction.
<span>Avogadro's number
represents the number of units in one mole of any substance. This has the value
of 6.022 x 10^23 units / mole. This number can be used to convert the number of
atoms or molecules into number of moles.
</span>1.83 moles K (6.022 x 10^23 atoms / mole ) = 1.10 x 10^24 atoms K
The time it takes for a point to reach 0 displacement from maximum displacement is

of a cycle. Thus, one period (

) will take

.
The frequency is simply

.
The speed is given by: