Answer:
The answer is nitric acid
Explanation:
Hope this helped Mark BRAINLIEST!!!
Ok to answer this question we firsst need to fin the number of mol of Urea (CH4N2O). to do this we simply :
1 mol of urea =15/60.055 = 0.25mol
therefore 200g of water contain 0.25mol
the next step is to determine the malality of our solution in 200g of water, to do this we say:
200 g = 1Kg/1000g = 0.2kg
therefor 0.25mol/0.2Kg = 1.25mol/kg
and from the equation:
we know that i = 1
we are given Kf
b is the molality that we just calculated
therefore;
the solutions freezing point is -2.325°C
Four people weigh a standard mass of 10.00 g on the same balance. The set of readings suggest measurements that are neither precise <span>nor accurate is the one with less mass</span>
Yes it could, but you'd have to set up the process very carefully.
I see two major challenges right away:
1). Displacement of water would not be a wise method, since rock salt
is soluble (dissolves) in water. So as soon as you start lowering it into
your graduated cylinder full of water, its volume would immediately start
to decrease. If you lowered it slowly enough, you might even measure
a volume close to zero, and when you pulled the string back out of the
water, there might be nothing left on the end of it.
So you would have to choose some other fluid besides water ... one in
which rock salt doesn't dissolve. I don't know right now what that could
be. You'd have to shop around and find one.
2). Whatever fluid you did choose, it would also have to be less dense
than rock salt. If it's more dense, then the rock salt just floats in it, and
never goes all the way under. If that happens, then you have a tough
time measuring the total volume of the lump.
So the displacement method could perhaps be used, in principle, but
it would not be easy.
