The force of the racket affects the ball's motion because it changes the momentum of the ball.
<h3>Impulse received by the ball</h3>
The impulse received by the ball through the racket affects the motion because it changes the momentum of the ball.
The ball which is initially at rest, will gain momentum after been hit with the racket.
J = ΔP = Ft
where;
- J is the impulse received by the ball
- ΔP is change in momentum of the ball
- F is the applied force
- t is the time of action
Thus, the force of the racket affects the ball's motion because it changes the momentum of the ball.
Learn more about impulse here: brainly.com/question/25700778
Answer:
The correct answer is B
Explanation:
Let's calculate the electric field using Gauss's law, which states that the electric field flow is equal to the charge faced by the dielectric permittivity
Φ
= ∫ E. dA = 
/ ε₀
For this case we create a Gaussian surface that is a sphere. We can see that the two of the sphere and the field lines from the spherical shell grant in the direction whereby the scalar product is reduced to the ordinary product
∫ E dA = / ε₀
The area of a sphere is
A = 4π r²
E 4π r² = / ε₀
E = (1 /4πε₀
) q / r²
Having the solution of the problem let's analyze the points:
A ) r = 3R / 4 = 0.75 R.
In this case there is no charge inside the Gaussian surface therefore the electric field is zero
E = 0
B) r = 5R / 4 = 1.25R
In this case the entire charge is inside the Gaussian surface, the field is
E = (1 /4πε₀
) Q / (1.25R)²
E = (1 /4πε₀
) Q / R2 1 / 1.56²
E₀ = (1 /4π ε₀
) Q / R²
= Eo /1.56
²
= 0.41 Eo
C) r = 2R
All charge inside is inside the Gaussian surface
=(1 /4π ε₀
) Q 1/(2R)²
= (1 /4π ε₀
) q/R² 1/4
= Eo 1/4
= 0.25 Eo
D) False the field changes with distance
The correct answer is B
The answer would be 981 newtons or 220.46 pounds.
Before we answer this question, let us first understand
what alternate hypothesis is.
The alternative hypothesis is the hypothesis which is
used in the hypothesis testing and this is opposite to the null hypothesis.
This is the test hypothesis which is usually taken to be that the observations
are the result of a real effect in an experiment.
In this case since what we want to set up is the
statistical test to see if the waves are dying down, then this means we are
trying to determine if the wave height are decreasing, so lesser than 16.4
feet. Therefore:
The alternative hypothesis would state (ANSWER)
Ha: μ less than 16.4 feet and
P-value area is on the left of the mean.
While the null hypothesis is the opposite and would state
H0: mu equals 16.4 feet
A = (Vf-Vi) / t,
a = (6-0)/3 = 2m/s^2,
F = ma = 2 * 2 = 4N
