If a government is trying to encourage economic growth, they would do all of these things except raise taxes. Raising taxes has the opposite effect and will slow growth because it takes more money out of the economy that could be used for growth and expansion.
Answer:
The following are the disadvantages and the advantages of bottom-up budgeting approach are as follows:
<u> Advantages of bottom-up budgeting approach:</u>
- The bottom-up budgeting approach helps in making the decisions very quickly as compared to all other budgeting methods.
- The main benefit of the bottom-up budgeting approach is that it helps in aligned the project goals in an organization by giving the specific direction.
- It helps in understand the resources, needs, expenses and the cost of each department in an organization.
<u> Disadvantages of bottom-up budgeting approach:</u>
- The bottom-up budgeting approach is complex as it sometimes cause misrepresent the budget figures in the given data.
- In this budgeting method there is also a lack of context and also expertise.
Answer:
$10,125 Favorable
Actual quantity of the cost-allocation base used - Actual quantity of the cost-allocation base that should have been used to produce the actual output) × Budgeted variable overhead cost per unit of the cost-allocation base
Explanation:
Variable overhead spending variance = Actual Spending - budgeted Spending based on actual quantity
Variable overhead spending variance = (Actual Input x Actual rate) - ( Actual input x Budgeted rate)
Variable overhead spending variance = (10,125 x $29) - ( 10,125 x $30)
Variable overhead spending variance = $293,625 - $303,750
Variable overhead spending variance = $10,125 Favorable
Variable overhead spending variance is
Actual quantity of the cost-allocation base used - Actual quantity of the cost-allocation base that should have been used to produce the actual output) × Budgeted variable overhead cost per unit of the cost-allocation base
Answer
The answer of the exercise is attached in a microsof excel document.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in a single sheet with the formulas indications.
Answer: The correct answer is "mediator; arbitrator".
Explanation: When negotiations appeared to be going in the wrong direction, an HVAC systems company and its union representatives agreed to bring in a <u>mediator</u>. This expert would serve as a facilitator to get negotiations back on track; whereas, if a <u>arbitrator</u> were solicited by both union and management, that person's decision in the situation would be binding.
A mediator is not the same as an arbitrator, the mediator is a third party that is in charge of facilitating and promoting communication and dialogue in order to finalize the negotiations according to the interests of each party.
On the other hand, an arbitrator is a third party that is in charge of listening to the interests and requests of each party and resolving the situation through an objective solution that is binding and obligatory for the parties.