1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Klio2033 [76]
2 years ago
13

Can anyone answer this question for me please..​

Physics
1 answer:
motikmotik2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

You have to sub x in for the number you dont know and then solve for x.

Explanation:

10(5+x)=90

50+10x=90

10x=40

x=4

You might be interested in
A particle leaves the origin with a speed of 3 106 m/s at 38 degrees to the positive x axis. It moves in a uniform electric fiel
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

If the particle is an electron E_y = 3.311 * 10^3 N/C

If the particle is a proton, E_y = 6.08 * 10^6 N/C

Explanation:

Initial speed at the origin, u = 3 * 10^6 m/s

\theta = 38^0 to +ve x-axis

The particle crosses the x-axis at , x = 1.5 cm = 0.015 m

The particle can either be an electron or a proton:

Mass of an electron, m_e = 9.1 * 10^{-31} kg

Mass of a proton, m_p = 1.67 * 10^{-27} kg

The electric field intensity along the positive y axis E_y, can be given by the formula:

E_y = \frac{2 m u^2 sin \theta cos \theta}{qx} \\

If the particle is an electron:

E_y = \frac{2 m_e u^2 sin \theta cos \theta}{qx} \\

E_y = \frac{2 * 9.1 * 10^{-31} * (3*10^6)^2 *(sin38)( cos38)}{1.6*10^{-19} * 0.015} \\

E_y = 3311.13 N/C\\E_y = 3.311 * 10^3 N/C

If the particle is a proton:

E_y = \frac{2 m_p u^2 sin \theta cos \theta}{qx} \\

E_y = \frac{2 * 1.67 * 10^{-27} * (3*10^6)^2 *(sin38)( cos38)}{1.6*10^{-19} * 0.015} \\

E_y = 6.08 * 10^6 N/C

8 0
2 years ago
What measures the amount of displacement in a transverse wave
MAVERICK [17]
Unlike a longitudinal wave, a transverse wave moves about, perpendicular to the direction of propagation. The particles in a transverse wave do not travel along the direction of propagation, but only oscillate up and down on its equilibrium position. With this, the displacement can be determined by measuring (in the case of electronic waves, using an oscilloscope or spectrum analyzer) and setting the desired units to measure the wave in.
4 0
3 years ago
If a sound wave travels 680 m in 2 seconds and has a frequency of 400 hz, what is the wavelength of the wave?
Kipish [7]

Answer: 0.85 meters (with and without sigfigs)

Explanation: To find the wavelength, you just have to switch around the equation for wave speed: v (wave speed) = λ (wavelength)*f (frequency) so λ (wavelength) = v (wave speed)/f (frequency). You don't have the wave speed but you can calculate it. Since wave speed is measured in meters/second or m/s, you just have to divide the amount of meters you were given by the amount of seconds. You will get 340 m/s. Next, you have to plug the values into the equation: λ (wavelength) = 340 m/s (wave speed)/400 Hz (frequency). The answer is 0.85 meters (seconds cancel) and has the correct number of significant figures.

5 0
3 years ago
What is the distance to a star whose parallex is 0.1 sec?
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

30.86\times 10^{13} km

Explanation:

Given the parallex of the star is 0.1 sec.

The distance is inversely related with the parallex of the star. Mathematically,

d=\frac{1}{P}

Here, d is the distance to a star which is measured in parsecs, and P is the parallex which is measured in arc seconds.

Now,

d=\frac{1}{0.1}\\d=10 parsec

And also know that,

1 parsec=3.086\times 10^{13} km

Therefore the distance of the star  is 30.86\times 10^{13} km away.

6 0
2 years ago
Would a measured force of (46.5 0.8 N  ) be in agreement with a theoretically calculated force of (48.4 0.6 N  ) ? Show your w
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

A measured force of (46.5 0.8 N  ) would not be in agreement with a theoretically calculated force of (48.4 0.6 N  )

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

  Measured force is  F_M  =  [46.5 \pm 0.8 \  N ]

   Calculated force is  F_c =  [48.4 \pm 0.6 \  N ]

Generally the measured force in interval form is

     46.5 - 0.8  < F_M  <  46.5 + 0.8

=>  45.7   < F_M  < 47.3

Generally the calculated  force in interval form is

     48.4 - 0.6  < F_c  <  48.4 + 0.6

=>  47.8   < F_M

Generally looking both interval we see that they do not intersect at any point Hence  

A measured force of (46.5 0.8 N  ) would not be in agreement with a theoretically calculated force of (48.4 0.6 N  )      

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The tides are considered an example of shallow-water waves because the tidal bulges have a wavelength that is on the order of __
    8·1 answer
  • At what distance from a long, straight wire carrying a current of 8.7 A is the magnetic field due to the wire equal to the stren
    8·1 answer
  • I need science fair ideas for 4th grade, But i need something that won't need a oven, sunlight, ETC. Also, i need something that
    13·1 answer
  • A dancer starts 3 meters from the curtain then moves 8 meters from the curtain in 15 seconds. What was his velocity?
    5·1 answer
  • For any object, the greater the force that's applied to it, the greater its ____ will be.
    11·2 answers
  • Two swimmers relax close together on air mattresses in a pool. One swimmer’s mass is 48 kg, and the other’s mass is 55 kg. If th
    12·2 answers
  • SPEED AND VELOCITY<br> Plz someone help
    12·1 answer
  • Brain
    5·1 answer
  • Which one is it? Chemical, or ,Mechanical<br><br><br> Flakes of brick fall off due to wind and rain.
    5·2 answers
  • A nearsighted eye has a far point of 100 cm. Objects further than 100 cm are not seen clearly. A diverging lens is used to permi
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!