Answer:
Explanation:
It wouldn't work because the wind energy she would be collecting would actually come from the car engine.
The relative wind velocity observed from a moving vehicle is the sum of the actual wind velocity and the velovity of the vehicle.
u' = u + v
While running a car will generate a rather high wind velocity, and increase the power generated by a wind turbine, the turbine would only be able to convert part of the wind energy into electricity while adding a lot of drag. In the end, it would generate less energy that what the drag casuses the car to waste to move the turbine.
Regenerative braking uses an electric generator connected to the wheel axle to recover part of the kinetic energy eliminated when one brakes the vehicle. Normal brakes dissipate this energy as heat, a regenerative brake uses it to recharge a batttery. Note that is is a fraction of the energy that is recovered, not all of it.
A "regenerative accelerator" makes no sense. Braking is taking kinetic energy out of the vehicle, while accelerating is adding kinetic energy to it. Cars accelerate using the power from their engines.
Answer:
hello your question is incomplete attached below is the complete question
answer: There is a hydraulic jump
Explanation:
First we have to calculate the depth of flow downstream of the gate
y1 = 
----------- ( 1 )
Cc ( concentration coefficient ) = 0.61 ( assumed )
Yg ( depth of gate opening ) = 0.5
hence equation 1 becomes
y1 = 0.61 * 0.5 = 0.305 m
calculate the flow per unit width q
q = Q / b ----------- ( 2 )
Q = 10 m^3 /s
b = 2 m
hence equation 2 becomes
q = 10 / 2 = 5 m^2/s
next calculate the depth before hydraulic jump y2 by using the hydraulic equation
answer : where y1 < y2 hence a hydraulic jump occurs in the lined channel
attached below is the remaining part of the solution
Answer:
a)- True
Explanation:
If two statements are inconsistent with each other it means that they are not telling the same, if they are not telling the same it means that only one of them COULD be true, but there is a third option where the two statements are wrong and non statement is telling the true...so:
If we have two statements inconsistent with each other, AT LEAST one of the statements is false.
