1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
torisob [31]
2 years ago
14

Why does the North star not move but the other stars move

Physics
1 answer:
blsea [12.9K]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

it's the star in the center of the star field

Explanation:

Why Doesn't Polaris Move? Polaris is very distant from Earth, and located in a position very near Earth's north celestial pole. ... Polaris is the star in the center of the star field; it shows essentially no movement. Earth's axis points almost directly to Polaris, so this star is observed to show the least movement

You might be interested in
The terrestrial planets are made almost entirely of elements heavier than hydrogen and helium. According to modern science, wher
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

They were produced by stars that lived and died before our solar system was born.

Explanation:

According to what it's understood today, all elements heavier than hydrogen (including helium and excluding some that were created in laboratories) are created through nuclear fusion in the core of stars.

They start fusing hydrogen into helium, then as the star grows older helium is fused into beryllium and so on for all the periodic table.

So as far as science understands it today it's a literal truth that we are made of stars. (as almost everything else)

8 0
3 years ago
Two equal magnitude electric charges are separated by a distance d. The electric potential at the midpoint between these two cha
Ann [662]

Answer:

The charges under study are of the same sign

The calculation of the electric field for each charge separately, there is no relationship between the charges

Explanation:

Let's start by writing the equation for the electric field

          E = k q / r²

where q is the charge under analysis and r the distance from this charge to a positive test charge.

When analyzing the statement the student has some problems.

* The charges under study are of the same sign, it does not matter if positive or negative.

* The calculation of the electric field for each charge separately, there is no relationship between the charges for the calculation of the electric field.

* What is added is the interaction of the electric field with the positive test charge, in this case each field has the opposite direction to the other, so the vector sum gives zero

8 0
3 years ago
Sasha lifts a couch 8.2 meters from the ground floor of her house to the attic. If the couch has a mass of 120 kg, what is the g
gavmur [86]

As we know that gravitational potential energy is given by

U = mgH

here we have

m = mass = 120 kg

g = 9.81 m/s^2

h = height = 8.2 m

now from above formula

U = 120kg (9.81 m/s^2) (8.2 m)

U = 9653.04 J

so above is the gravitational potential energy of the couch

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A child is riding a bike at a speed of 6m/s with a total kinetic energy of 1224J. If the mass of the child is 30kg, what is the
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

 Mass of bike = 38 kg.

Explanation:

Kinetic energy is given by the expression, KE = \frac{1}{2} mv^2, where m is the mass and v is the velocity.

Here speed of child riding bike = 6 m/s

Mass of child = 30 kg

Total kinetic energy = 1224 J

Let the mass of bike be, m kg

So, total mass of child and bike = (m + 30) kg

Substituting,

  1224 = \frac{1}{2}* (m+30)*6^2\\ \\ m+30=68\\ \\ m=38kg

So, mass of bike = 38 kg.

3 0
3 years ago
Two bicycle tires are set rolling with the same initial speed of 3.30 m/s along a long, straight road, and the distance each tra
vredina [299]

Answer:

At low pressure- \mu_{k}=0.02315

At high pressure- \mu_{k}=0.00445

Explanation:

Initial speed, V_{i}=3.3 m/s

Final speed, V_{f}=3.3/2= 1.65 m/s

Net horizontal force due to rolling friction F_{net}=\mu_{k} mg where m is mass, g is acceleration due to gravity, \mu_{k} is coefficient of rolling friction

From kinematic relation, V_{f}^{2}- V_{i}^{2}=2ad

For each tire,

V_{f}^{2}- V_{i}^{2}=2\mu_{k}gd

Making \mu_{k} the subject

\mu_{k}=\frac {V_{f}^{2}- V_{i}^{2}}{2gd}

Under low pressure of 40 Psi, d=18 m

\mu_{k}=\frac {1.65^{2}- 3.3^{2}}{2*9.8*18}=-0.02315

Therefore, \mu_{k}=0.02315

At a pressure of 105 Psi, d=93.7

\mu_{k}=\frac {1.65^{2}- 3.3^{2}}{2*9.8*93.7}=-0.00445

Therefore, \mu_{k}=0.00445

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In each case, a charged rod, made of the dense rubber ebonite, comes close or is in contact with the top of an electroscope. The
    11·2 answers
  • In the equation for Ohm’s law what does I stand for?
    5·1 answer
  • Moons gravity and its comparison with earths gravity
    6·2 answers
  • Select all that apply.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true? A. Balanced forces do not cause a change in motion. B. Balanced forces always cause a
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a benefit of cool down activities?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the state of an object accelerating due to the force of gravity alone?
    8·1 answer
  • Electrons (mass m, charge –e) are accelerated from rest through a potential difference V and are then deflected by a magnetic fi
    13·1 answer
  • What voltage is measured across the 15 ohm resistor
    14·1 answer
  • Can you guys please help me on this one?​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!