All categories

3 years ago

La siguiente ilustración muestra un purificador de agua que utiliza energía solar.

Chemistry

1 answer:

BabaBlast [244]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Requiere que el agua pase por membranas de filtración.

Explanation:

Un purificador de agua que utiliza energía solar es un dispositivo innovador y tecnológico que funciona como una estación de saneamiento básico con capacidad para purificar el agua y eliminar el 99% de virus y bacterias.

El sistema funciona de la siguiente manera: cuenta con bomba, panel solar, cargador y mangueras. La bomba mueve el agua a través del filtro utilizando la energía de la batería que se carga con la energía de la luz solar. Incluso en días con poca exposición al sol, el sistema es capaz de utilizar la energía acumulada de la batería y purificar 1 litro de agua en 1 minuto.

Se trata de una tecnología simple e innovadora que puede ser de gran ayuda en el saneamiento básico de lugares que no contienen agua potable, debido a la facilidad y portabilidad del sistema.

You might be interested in

How can you distinguish between a solution, colloid, and suspension?

RSB [31]

Answer:

solution is clear solution while colloidal is between the solution and suspension. And in suspension particles are suspended.

Explanation:

In solution light can be passed without any scattering of light from solute particles while suspension is cloudy and having larger particle size than colloids, if suspension stands for a while particles will settle down easily.

In colloids light will scattered and dispersed by reflecting with large particles.

3 0

4 years ago

Calculate the ph at of a solution of sodium hypochlorite . note that hypochlorous acid is a weak acid with a of . round your ans

loris [4]

The question is incomplete, here is the complete question:

Calculate the pH at 25°C of a 0.39 M solution of sodium hypochlorite NaClO. Note that hypochlorous acid HClO is a weak acid with a pKa of 7.50. Round your answer to 1 decimal place.

Answer: The pH of the solution is 10.4

Explanation:

We are given:

Molarity of sodium hypochlorite = 0.39 M

$pK_a$ of HClO = 7.50

We know that:

$pK_a=-\log K_a$

$K_a$ of HClO = $10^{-7.50}=3.16\times 10^{-8}$

To calculate the base dissociation constant for the given acid dissociation constant, we use the equation:

$K_w=K_b\times K_a$

where,

$K_w$ = Ionic product of water = $10^{-14}$

$K_a$ = Acid dissociation constant = $3.16\times 10^{-8}$

$K_b$ = Base dissociation constant

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$10^{-14}=3.16\times 10^{-8}\times K_b\\\\K_b=\frac{10^{-14}}{3.16\times 10^{-8}}=3.16\times 10^{-7}$

The chemical equation for the reaction of hypochlorite ion with water follows:

$ClO^-+H_2O\rightarrow HClO+OH^-$

Initial: 0.39

At eqllm: 0.39-x x x

The expression of $K_b$ for above equation follows:

$K_b=\frac{[HClO][OH^-]}{[ClO^-]}$

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$3.16\times 10^{-7}=\frac{x\times x}{(0.39-x)}\\\\x=-0.00035,0.00035$

Neglecting the negative value of 'x' because concentration cannot be negative

To calculate the pOH of the solution, we use the equation:

$pOH=-\log[OH^-]$

We are given:

$[OH^-]=0.00035M$

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$pOH=-\log (0.00035)=3.6$

To calculate pH of the solution, we use the equation:

$pH+pOH=14\\pH=14-3.6=10.4$

Hence, the pH of the solution is 10.4

3 0

3 years ago

Increased use of incineration is sometimes advocated as a safe way to dispose of chemical waste. But opponents of incineration p

pochemuha

Answer:

Option A is correct.

At the two incinerators at which leaks were reported, staff had had only cursory training on the proper procedures for incinerating chemical waste.

Explanation:

The main aim of the argument presented is to talk down the use of burning by incinerators method to dispose chemical waste. The argument presents great points in that there were 40 incidents at two existing commissioned incinerators in the last year where unexpected releases of dangerous chemical agents happened.

So, basically, the argument is all about how the high frequency of the unsuspected release of dangerous chemical agents should discourage this method of chemical waste disposal.

The argument then concluded that if more chemical waste are disposed using the burning by incinerator method, there will be more unsuspected release of dangerous chemicals.

We are then required to find the statement that most weakens the conclusion that there will be more toxic releases if more chemical waste are burned.

Analysing the Statements one by one

Statement A

This statement provides a possible reason for this high frequency of dangerous chemical releases. It states that the staff haven't been properly trained. So, this means that properly training the staff should most likely lead to lesser cases of toxic releases into the environment.

This is the statement that most weakens the conclusion.

Statement B

The conclusion wasn't about the incinerator method being the safest method. It was about whether increased incineration would lead to more toxic relaeses. So, this doesn't affect the conclusion.

Statement C

This statement says that incineration can be increased without building new incinerators by tapping into unused capacity at the old incinerators. Also doesn't affect rhe conclusion whether increased use of incineration will lead to more toxic leaks.

Statement D

This statement strengthens the argument; which is the opposite of what we're aiming to achieve.

Statement E

This statement hints that the toxic leaks do not have that much of a harmful effect because the toxic releases do not go beyond the property of the incinerator. This also doesnt tackle the conclusion about the frequency of leaks, it only addresses how not harmful the toxic leaks can be.

Hope this Helps!!!

5 0

4 years ago

How many total orbitals are within the 3s, 3p, and energy level?

Nina [5.8K]

The answer for the following question is explained below.

Therefore the total number of orbitals are " 9 ".

Explanation:

Orbital:

An orbital is a mathematical function that describes the wave-like behavior of an electron,electron pair,or the nucleons.

The total number of orbitals present in the 3rd energy level is 9.

Here,

A 3 s subshell has only one orbital.

A 3 p subshell has three orbitals.

A 3 d subshell has five orbitals.

Therefore the total number of orbitals is:

3 s = 1 orbital

3 p = 3 orbitals

3 d = 5 orbitals

total orbitals in 3rd energy level is = 1 + 3 + 5 =9

Therefore the total number of orbitals are " 9 ".

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How is a pure substance different from a mixture?

Sauron [17]

The answer is A.
Pure substance is either an element or a compound, which elements in compund is chemically combined together. They cannot be separated by physical methods such as filtration or evaporation. Compounds can only be separated by chemical methods, which include using electricity (electrolysis) or applying heat.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers