All categories

3 years ago

When equilibrium is reached in an electrochemical cell, the voltage reaches its maximum value. 1. false 2. true?

Physics

2 answers:

tigry1 [53]3 years ago

7 0

False

Voltage in an electrochemical cell is in indication of equilibrium, higher will be the non-equilibrium, higher will be the voltage, or we can say at equilibrium voltage tends to 0.

Voltage in an electrical cell is the result of flow of electron, which flow due to difference in charge of the cells, higher the charge difference higher will be the voltage, as the equilibrium between the chemical cells established the flow of electron will stop, and the voltage of the cell tend to 0.

WITCHER [35]3 years ago

7 0

Answer: The given statement is false.

Explanation:

Voltage in an electrochemical cell helps in determining that the system is out of equilibrium.

When a redox reaction approaches towards equilibrium then there occurs flow of electrons with the advancement in chemical reaction. This means as the chemical reaction proceeds towards completion then flow of electrons also takes place.

Hence, cell potential decreases until the reaction reaches at equilibrium where, $\Delta G$ = 0.

Also, $\Delta G = -nFE$ . So, at equilibrium voltage becomes equal to zero and current also stops.

Thus, we can conclude that the statement when equilibrium is reached in an electrochemical cell, the voltage reaches its maximum value is false.

You might be interested in

Four identical balls are thrown from the top of a cliff, each with the same speed. The

Jlenok [28]

Answer:

the speed and the kinetic energy of the first and fourth ball are equal, while the speed and kinetic energy of the second and third balls are equal

Explanation:

The kinetic energy, K.E. = (1/2) × m × v²

The velocity of the ball, v = u × sin(θ)

Where;

u = The initial velocity of the ball

θ = The reference angle

1) For the ball thrown straight up, we have;

θ = 90°

∴ v = u

The final velocity of the ball as it strikes the ground is v₂ = u² + 2gh

Where;

h = The height of the cliff

∴ K.E. = (1/2) × m × (u² + 2gh)²

2) For the second ball thrown 30° to the horizontal, we have;

K.E. = (1/2) × m × ((u×sin30)² + 2·g·h)² = K.E. = (1/2) × m × ((0.5·u)² + 2·g·h)²

3) For the third ball thrown at 30° below the horizontal, we have;

K.E. = (1/2) × m × ((u×sin30)² + 2·g·h)² = K.E. = (1/2) × m × ((0.5·u)² + 2·g·h)²

4) For the fourth ball thrown straight down, we have;

K.E. = (1/2) × m × (u² + 2gh)²

Therefore, as the ball strike the ground, the speed and the kinetic energy of the first and fourth ball are equal, while the speed and kinetic energy of the second and third balls are equal

Learn more about object kinetic energy of object if free fall here;

brainly.com/question/14872097

6 0

3 years ago

An object is thrown straight up into the air with an initial speed of 8 m/s, and reaches a greatest height of 15 m before it fal

Ugo [173]

Answer:

The value is $T_t = 2.5659 \ s$

Explanation:

From the we are told that

The initial speed of the object is $u = 8 \ m/s$

The greatest height it reached is $h = 15 \ m$

Generally from kinematic equation we have that

$v^2 = u^2 + 2gH$

At maximum height v = 0 m/s

$0^2 = 8^2 + 2 * - 9.8 * H$

=> $H = 3.27 \ m$

Here H is the height from the initial height to the maximum height

So the initial height is mathematically represented as

$s = h - H$

=> $s = 15 - 3.27$

=> $s = 11.73 \ m$

Generally the time taken for the object to reach maximum height is mathematically evaluated using kinematic equation as follows

$v = u + (-g) t$

At maximum height v = 0 m/s

$0 = 8 - 9.8t$

=> $t = 0.8163 \ s$

Generally the time taken for the object to move from the maximum height to the ground is mathematically using kinematic equation as follows

$h = ut_1 + \frac{1}{2} gt_1^2$

Here the initial velocity is 0 m/s given that its the velocity at maximum height

Also g is positive because we are moving in the direction of gravity

$15 = 0* t + 4.9 t^2$

=> $t_1 = 1.7496$

Generally the total time taken is mathematically represented as

$T_t = t + t_1$

=> $T_t = 0.8163 + 1.7496$

=> $T_t = 2.5659 \ s$

6 0

3 years ago

Find the acceleration produced.

krok68 [10]

Answer:

0.67m/s²

Explanation:

Given parameters:

Mass of toy = 1.2kg

Force applied = 0.8N

Unknown:

Acceleration = ?

Solution:

According to newton's second law of motion;

Force = mass x acceleration

Now,

Acceleration = $\frac{Force}{mass}$

Acceleration = $\frac{0.8}{1.2}$ = 0.67m/s²

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

2. A 20 cm object is placed 10cm in front of a convex lens of focal length 5cm. Calculate

adoni [48]

Answer:

 » Image distance :

${ \tt{ \frac{1}{v} + \frac{1}{u} = \frac{1}{f} }} \\$

v is image distance
u is object distance, u is 10 cm
f is focal length, f is 5 cm

${ \tt{ \frac{1}{v} + \frac{1}{10} = \frac{1}{5} }} \\ \\ { \tt{ \frac{1}{v} = \frac{1}{10} }} \\ \\ { \tt{v = 10}} \\ \\ { \underline{ \underline{ \pmb{ \red{ \: image \: distance \: is \: 10 \: cm \: \: }}}}}$

 » Magnification :

• Let's derive this formula from the lens formula:

${ \tt{ \frac{1}{v} + \frac{1}{u} = \frac{1}{f} }} \\$

» Multiply throughout by fv

${ \tt{fv( \frac{1}{v} + \frac{1}{u} ) = fv( \frac{1}{f} )}} \\ \\ { \tt{ \frac{fv}{v} + \frac{fv}{u} = \frac{fv}{f} }} \\ \\ { \tt{f + f( \frac{v}{u} ) = v}}$

• But we know that, v/u is M

${ \tt{f + fM = v}} \\ { \tt{f(1 +M) = v }} \\ { \tt{1 +M = \frac{v}{f} }} \\ \\ { \boxed{ \mathfrak{formular : } \: { \tt{ M = \frac{v}{f} - 1 }}}}$

v is image distance, v is 10 cm
f is focal length, f is 5 cm
M is magnification.

${ \tt{M = \frac{10}{5} - 1 }} \\ \\ { \tt{M = 5 - 1}} \\ \\ { \underline{ \underline{ \pmb{ \red{ \: magnification \: is \: 4}}}}}$

 » Nature of Image :

Image is magnified
Image is erect or upright
Image is inverted
Image distance is identical to object distance.

4 0

2 years ago

Function of a simple pendulum

Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

A pendulum is a mechanical machine that creates a repeating, oscillating motion. A pendulum of fixed length and mass (neglecting loss mechanisms like friction and assuming only small angles of oscillation) has a single, constant frequency. This can be useful for a great many things.

From a historical point of view, pendulums became important for time measurement. Simply counting the oscillations of the pendulum, or attaching the pendulum to a clockwork can help you track time. Making the pendulum in such a way that it holds its shape and dimensions (in changing temperature etc.) and using mechanisms that counteract damping due to friction led to the creation of some of the first very accurate all-weather clocks.

Pendulums were/are also important for musicians, where mechanical metronomes are used to provide a notion of rhythm by clicking at a set frequency.

The Foucault pendulum demonstrated that the Earth is, indeed, spinning around its axis. It is a pendulum that is free to swing in any planar angle. The initial swing impacts an angular momentum in a given angle to the pendulum. Due to the conservation of angular momentum, even though the Earth is spinning underneath the pendulum during the day-night cycle, the pendulum will keep its original plane of oscillation. For us, observers on Earth, it will appear that the plane of oscillation of the pendulum slowly revolves during the day.

Apart from that, in physics a pendulum is one of the most, if not the most important physical system. The reason is this - a mathematical pendulum, when swung under small angles, can be reasonably well approximated by a harmonic oscillator. A harmonic oscillator is a physical system with a returning force present that scales linearly with the displacement. Or, in other words, it is a physical system that exhibits a parabolic potential energy.

A physical system will always try to minimize its potential energy (you can accept this as a definition, or think about it and arrive at the same conclusion). So, in the low-energy world around us, nearly everything is very close to the local minimum of the potential energy. Given any shape of the potential energy ‘landscape’, close to the minima we can use Taylor expansion to approximate the real potential energy by a sum of polynomial functions or powers of the displacement. The 0th power of anything is a constant and due to the free choice of zero point energy it doesn’t affect the physical evolution of the system. The 1st power term is, near the minimum, zero from definition. Imagine a marble in a bowl. It doesn’t matter if the bowl is on the ground or on the table, or even on top of a building (0th term of the Taylor expansion is irrelevant). The 1st order term corresponds to a slanted plane. The bottom of the bowl is symmetric, though. If you could find a slanted plane at the bottom of the bowl that would approximate the shape of the bowl well, then simply moving in the direction of the slanted plane down would lead you even deeper, which would mean that the true bottom of the bowl is in that direction, which is a contradiction since we started at the bottom of the bowl already. In other words, in the vicinity of the minimum we can set the linear, 1st order term to be equal to zero. The next term in the expansion is the 2nd order or harmonic term, a quadratic polynomial. This is the harmonic potential. Every higher term will be smaller than this quadratic term, since we are very close to the minimum and thus the displacement is a small number and taking increasingly higher powers of a small number leads to an even smaller number.

This means that most of the physical phenomena around us can be, reasonable well, described by using the same approach as is needed to describe a pendulum! And if this is not enough, we simply need to look at the next term in the expansion of the potential of a pendulum and use that! That’s why each and every physics students solves dozens of variations of pendulums, oscillators, oscillating circuits, vibrating strings, quantum harmonic oscillators, etc.; and why most of undergraduate physics revolves in one way or another around pendulums.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago