14 increased by 125% is 17.5
Answer:
Jane is not correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jane must have complete several examples using positive numbers. That conclusion does not apply for negative numbers.
Let's see an example:
Given the number 5:
- its opposite number is: -5
- the opposite of this opposite number: is 5
Note that is the same number and it is positive.
However, if we check the same situation with a negative number:
Given the number -3:
- its opposite number is: 3
- the opposite of this opposite number: is -3
In conclusion, Jane's conclusion is wrong. The opposite of the opposite number is not always a positive number.
Answer:
= 56°
= 34°
Step-by-step explanation:
3x + 5 + 2x = 90°
3x + 2x + 5 = 90°
5x + 5 = 90°
5x = 90 - 5
5x = 85
x = 85/5
x = 17
3x + 5
= 3(17) + 5
= 51 + 5
= 56°
2x
= 2(17)
= 34°
Instead I’d using the values 1,2,3,4,5,6 on dice, suppose a pair of dice have the following 1,2,2,3,3,4 on one die and 1,3,4,5,6
Oxana [17]
Answer:1/24
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the first die has 4 distinct numbers, and second has 6 distinct numbers, so total number of combinations possible = 4 × 6 = 24
Now, the number of chances where we get the rolling sum as 12 is only one. (
Therefore, the probability of getting sum 12 is 1/24
Answer:
Part 1:- option first is correct

Part 1:- option third is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
The given ration expressions are.
1. 
2. 
We need to simplify the given expressions.
Solution:
Part 1:-
Given expression is

Using law of exponents 




Therefore, option first
is correct.
Part 2:-
Given expression is.

Using law of exponents 




Therefore, third option
is correct.