Why can't elements be separated into smaller parts using chemical means? Too much energy is required, since you'd have to break them down into protons, neutrons, and electrons. You can get this much energy together with nuclear reactions, but not by chemical means.
V= d/t
v=speed
d=distance
t=time
So v= 422/3
v =140.667m/s
<span>The rare earth elements include the lanthanide series, scandium and yttrium. They are a set of seventeen chemical elements in the periodic table. They really are not that rare but they occur together in nature and are hard to separate from one another.</span>
I think the answer is B.
I know the answer cant be A because a lot of metal that is new can be shiny.
C is incorrect because malleable means that it can be permanently bent out of shape ( which metal can be )
D is incorrect because a lot of metal can conduct electricity for example copper and brass can both conduct electricity
<span />
Answer:
0.20 mol
Explanation:
Let's consider the reduction of iron from an aqueous solution of iron (II).
Fe²⁺ + 2 e⁻ ⇒ Fe
The molar mass of Fe is 55.85 g/mol. The moles corresponding to 5.6 g of Fe are:
5.6 g × 1 mol/55.85 g = 0.10 mol
2 moles of electrons are required to deposit 1 mole of Fe. The moles of electrons required to deposit 0.10 moles of Fe are
0.10 mol Fe × 2 mol e⁻/1 mol Fe = 0.20 mol e⁻
