Answer:
34.02 g.
Explanation:
Hello!
In this case, since the gas behaves ideally, we can use the following equation to compute the moles at the specified conditions:
Now, since the molar mass of a compound is computed by dividing the mass over mass, we obtain the following molar mass:
So probably, the gas may be H₂S.
Best regards!
The statement which is true is
Fluorine is more reactive than nitrogen because fluorine needs only one electron to fill its outermost shell.
<u><em>Explanation</em></u>
Fluorine has electron configuration of 1S²2S²2P⁵ while nitrogen has 1S²2S²2P³ electron configuration.
The 2P sub shell for nitrogen is half filled therefore it is sable than fluorine.
since p orbital can hold a maximum of 6 electrons ,Fluorine requires 1 electron to completely fill it's 2P sub shell which make it more reactive than nitrogen.
Answer:
so the answer that you get isn't wrong? i dont know
Answer:
Explanation:
The major difference between pure and applied chemistry is the purpose and intent of the study.
Pure chemistry deals with the study of matter, matter transformations, and interactions between the different materials of the world, for only the sake of gaining empirical knowledge about the various substances that exist in the world. It does not really seek to apply this knowledge to do anything industrial.
Applied chemistry is the study of chemistry with the aim of utilizing this knowledge to solve the various problems that man faces. This approach of study is not for knowledge sake alone, rather it is for industrial application
The hypothesis should be; "Increasing the amount of ice increases the rate at which the ice will melt"
<h3>What is a hypothesis?</h3>
The term hypothesis refers to a tentative explanation that could be applied in order to explain an observation. When we give a hypothesis, it must be subjected to rigorous experimentation thus it can be confirmed or repelled by experiment.
Now, we can see that the question here is; "How does the amount of salt added to ice affect the rate at which the ice will melt?" This implies that the correct hypothesis here ought to have to do with the impact of the amount of ice in the affirmative.
Thus, the hypothesis should be; "Increasing the amount of ice increases the rate at which the ice will melt"
Learn more about hypothesis:brainly.com/question/13025783
#SPJ1
