The intermolecular force that attracts two nonpolar molecules is London dispersion forces, which are also called induced dipole-induced
Depression in freezing point (Δ

) =

×m×i,
where,

= cryoscopic constant =

,
m= molality of solution = 0.0085 m
i = van't Hoff factor = 2 (For

)
Thus, (Δ

) = 1.86 X 0.0085 X 2 =

Now, (Δ

) =

- T
Here, T = freezing point of solution

= freezing point of solvent =

Thus, T =

- (Δ

) = -
The statement “Only the “Conclusion” section discusses whether the original hypothesis was supported, and both sections suggest further research”, best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Answer: Option 4
<u>Explanation:
</u>
In research, we do experiments and derive the results. Then, those results were analyzed by us. In this analysis part, we compare our results with the related results published elsewhere. Also, we correlate the similarities and point out the differences between our analysis and other reported results.
In conclusion part, we have to check hypothesis or it supported. And, we summarise our analysis and figure out the further research need to be done on that to improvise our research. So, the final statement is the correct option which best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Williamson synthesis is the most common way for obtaining ethers, called after its developer Alexander Williamson. It is an organic reaction of forming ethers from an organohalide and an alkoxide. The reaction is carried out according to the SN2 mechanism.
On the attached picture it is shown required alkoxide ion, <span>alkyl(aryl)bromide and the ether that forms from the reactants. </span>
Answer:
Multiply 3 by Avogadro's number.
Explanation:
The mole can be defined as the amount of a substance that contains Avogadro’s number of particles, 6.02 x 10²³.
For elementary particles:
Number of particles=
number of moles x 6.02 x10²³
From the question,
Number of moles = 3moles
Number of particles = 3 x 6.02 x10²³