Answer:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly higher than 0.1 and then Company B can reject the shipment
Step-by-step explanation:
Information provided
n=400 represent the random sample taken
X=59 represent number of defectives from the company B
estimated proportion of defectives from the company B
is the value to verify
represent the significance level
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to verify if the true proportion of defectives is higher than 0.1 then the system of hypothesis are.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic would be given by:
(1)
Replacing the info given we got:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly higher than 0.1 and then Company B can reject the shipment
Answer:
K=8
Step-by-step explanation:
The triangles are similar so you can set up the porpotions: 3/6=4/k then you cross multiply and solve for k
Answer: 200 minutes have to be used for the costs of both plans to be the same.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent the number of minutes that have to be used for the costs of both plans to be the same.
Package A is $35.00 per month with an additional charge of $0.15 per minute for long distance. This means that the cost of using package A for x minutes in a month would be
35 + 0.15x
Package B is $45.00 per month with an additional charge of $0.10 per minute for long distance. This means that the cost of using package A for x minutes in a month would be
45 + 0.1x
For both costs to be the same, it means that
35 + 0.15x = 45 + 0.1x
0.15x - 0.1x = 45 - 35
0.05x = 10
x = 10/0.05
x = 200
Answer:
second one
Step-by-step explanation: