Answer:
9) a = 25 [m/s^2], t = 4 [s]
10) a = 0.0875 [m/s^2], t = 34.3 [s]
11) t = 32 [s]
Explanation:
To solve this problem we must use kinematics equations. In this way we have:
9)
a)
where:
Vf = final velocity = 0
Vi = initial velocity = 100 [m/s]
a = acceleration [m/s^2]
x = distance = 200 [m]
Note: the final speed is zero, as the car stops completely when it stops. The negative sign of the equation means that the car loses speed or slows down as it stops.
0 = (100)^2 - (2*a*200)
a = 25 [m/s^2]
b)
Now using the following equation:
0 = 100 - (25*t)
t = 4 [s]
10)
a)
To solve this problem we must use kinematics equations. In this way we have:
Note: The positive sign of the equation means that the car increases his speed.
5^2 = 2^2 + 2*a*(125 - 5)
25 - 4 = 2*a* (120)
a = 0.0875 [m/s^2]
b)
Now using the following equation:
5 = 2 + 0.0875*t
3 = 0.0875*t
t = 34.3 [s]
11)
To solve this problem we must use kinematics equations. In this way we have:
10^2 = 2^2 + 2*a*(200 - 10)
100 - 4 = 2*a* (190)
a = 0.25 [m/s^2]
Now using the following equation:
10 = 2 + 0.25*t
8 = 0.25*t
t = 32 [s]
Answer:
No..
Explanation:
As the bird releases the drop there is no internal force which will drive it into circular path but it will fall on tangent of the arc at the point of release because it has a tangential velocity same as bird. Path will be parabola in vertical plane.
As the person is on circular arc constantly moving it will never meet that drop.
Answer:
The volume of 3200 kg of petrol is 4 m^3.
if there were no invention of machines then life would have been more difficult and simple works could be hard to do. Even now we are using our phones, sitting in a AC room interacting to eachother from different places. without the invention of machines simple things like transportation would have been difficult. There would be horses and donkey for the transportation. There would be no electricity,no internet, no transportation, not even c computers or mobile etc. The market for business will be smaller, the knowledge and news about world would be less.
so the problem would have been bigger than we can imagine. But one thing is that nature could survive lot more compared to what we have done till now by destroying nature.
