Answer:
- <em>The molar concentraion is </em><u>0.74 M</u>
Explanation:
<u>1) Data:</u>
a) % w/v = 2.5%
b) compound: H₂O₂ (from a table molar mass = 34.0147 g/mol)
c) M = ?
<u>2) Formulae:</u>
a) % w/v = (mass of soulte / volume of solution) × 100
b) numer of moles, n = mass in grams / molar mass
c) M = number of moles of solute / liters of solution
<u>3) Solution:</u>
a) T<u>ake a base of 100 ml of solution (0.100 liter)</u>:
- %w/v = 2.5% = 2.5 g solute / 100 ml solution
- mass of solute = 2.5 g / 100 ml × 100 ml = 2.5 g
b) <u>Calculate the number of moles of solute, n</u>:
- n = mass in grams / molar mass = 2.5 g / 34.0147 g/mol = 0.0735 mol
c) <u>Calculate the molarity, M</u>:
- M = n / V in liter = 0.0735 mol / 0.100 liter = 0.735 M
Round to two significant figures: 0.74 M ← answer
Well, there’s some pretty poor choices out there, but I think chlorine trifluoride would be the worst since it would burn everything it touched.
Answer:
The O atom will tend to attract the electrons.
Explanation:
The electronegativity of O (3.5) is much higher than H (2.1), which means it is more likely to attract electrons. The higher the electronegativity, the more attractive.
We have that after 1 half-life, the reactant reaches half its concentration

. After 2 half-lives it reaches

of its concentration, namely one-fourth. After n half lives we have that it reaches

of its initial concentration. Thus, we have to solve the equation

. Taking the log base 2 of each part of the equation we get from logarithm properties:
![log_{2}[(1/2)^n]=log_{2}(2^{-n})=-n](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=log_%7B2%7D%5B%281%2F2%29%5En%5D%3Dlog_%7B2%7D%282%5E%7B-n%7D%29%3D-n)
. The other hand yields:

. Solving for n we get that n=1.74. Thus, after around 1.74 half lives the concentration becomes 30% of the initial one. Note how this is consistent with our previous analysis; if we let it a little bit more, 2 half-lives, the concentration will become 25% of the initial.