Answer:
At the point when the quantity of bit strings is not exactly the quantity of processors, at that point a portion of the processors would stay inert since the scheduler maps just part strings to processors and not client level strings to processors. At the point when the quantity of part strings is actually equivalent to the quantity of processors, at that point it is conceivable that the entirety of the processors may be used all the while. Be that as it may, when a part string obstructs inside the portion (because of a page flaw or while summoning framework calls), the comparing processor would stay inert. When there are more portion strings than processors, a blocked piece string could be swapped out for another bit string that is prepared to execute, in this way expanding the use of the multiprocessor system.When the quantity of part strings is not exactly the quantity of processors, at that point a portion of the processors would stay inert since the scheduler maps just bit strings to processors and not client level strings to processors. At the point when the quantity of bit strings is actually equivalent to the quantity of processors, at that point it is conceivable that the entirety of the processors may be used at the same time. Be that as it may, when a part string hinders inside the piece (because of a page flaw or while summoning framework calls), the relating processor would stay inert. When there are more portion strings than processors, a blocked piece string could be swapped out for another bit string that is prepared to execute, along these lines expanding the usage of the multiprocessor framework.
The C++ code that would draw all the iterations in the selection sort process on the array is given below:
<h3>C++ Code</h3>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main() {
int i, temp1, temp2;
int string2[16] = { 0, 4, 2, 5, 1, 5, 6, 2, 6, 89, 21, 32, 31, 5, 32, 12 };
_Bool check = 1;
while (check) {
temp1 = string2[i];
temp2 = string2[i + 1];
if (temp1 < temp2) {
string2[i + 1] = temp1;
string2[i] = temp2;
i = 0;
} else {
i++;
if (i = 15) {
check = !check;
}
}
}
return 0;
}
Read more about C++ programming here:
brainly.com/question/20339175
#SPJ1
Answer:
Obviously you shouldn't rely just on the meter for your safety. You'd disconnect wall fuses or kill main switches before you start, using the meter just gives you some extra protection: with the meter you might notice for example that you've disconnected the wrong fuse and the unit is still live.
Explanation:
Hope it helps! :)
