All categories

3 years ago

Assuming that social networks reduce criminal behavior, one plausible hypothesis would be that:

Social Studies

1 answer:

Wittaler [7]3 years ago

8 0

I believe the answer is:C. People with few friends should be more likely to commit crimes

Number of friends usually consistent with lesser chance of depression and higher chance of obtaining help during troubles. Even though this may not applicable all the time, We can assume that people with lesser friends are more likely to experience the opposite, which increase the potential to be criminals.

You might be interested in

What are some examples of president Donald trump exercising two types of presidential powers?

Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

executive

Explanation:

He he he he he

8 0

2 years ago

In an experiment examining the effects of stress on decision making, researchers use two independent variables with two levels e

Dahasolnce [82]

Answer:Mixed factorial design

Explanation:

Mixed factorial design is a design that involve the use of two or more independent variable where one of the independent variable is between group and the other is within subject independent variable.

Temperature is the independent variable between the group and noise is the independent variable that is exposed to within the subject.

It is mixed because it has many factors relating together.

4 0

3 years ago

Select the statement that is NOT a component of a standard housing lease. AWhat repairs are the renter's responsibility. BType o

drek231 [11]

(D) is the most correct answer. Most standard lease agreements will not have a clause that requires the person renting to purchase homeowner's insurance. This would be something that would more likely be done by the person renting out the property or the owner or the property.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Propaganda may be both positive and negative in viewpoint and effect. a. True b. False

n200080 [17]

If the words "positive" and "negative" here refer to whether propaganda aims to create a positive or negative image, then the answer is :"True".

For example, in Socialist Countries in 1970s a big portion of propaganda was positive, aiming at convincing the citizens that socialism is good for the country.

3 0

3 years ago

First: Analyze and evaluate Descartes’ two proofs of God's existence. How are they different? Is one more convincing than the ot

frosja888 [35]

Answer:

Check Explanation

Explanation:

Rene Descartes, a French philosopher, mathematician, and scientist, provided two great proof of God's existence which is known as "Two Proof of God’s Existence"

The first proof was that everything and beings In this world was created, and that a living or non living thing can't not be created on there own.

The second proof is that there is a power that is presserving human and no human being possess such powers except a divine being

The DIFFERENCE between the two proof stated above is that one stated that humans don't have powers on there own for preservation while the first stated that humans can not be created on there own. He made futher clarification that every object is created by someone. So, humans have Creator. The first proof talks about how Humans can not be created on it own which mean God is supreme and he his perfect while the second proof is that there Is a POWER behind human creation,means that in studying humans philosophy Which concerned Humans Attribute, such powers can't be control by humans Both proofs look alike but are different in meaning.

Both proof supports each other. The first proof, talking about human having a Creator directly talks about God powers and if the second proof supports it by looking at human philosophy, that is; if any humans study his or her attribute, the truth will be seen that humans being don't possess the powers to be created on it own.

Humans beings Made ERRORS according to Descartes, he said that the idea of perfectness was necessary because humans must exist has imperfect beings and only by that can humans knows that God is the Creator. If humans can only knows that there is creator behind them,if they made mistakes as imperfect beings. So, that the idea of perfectness will always be on humans mind

Furthermore, he said finite intellect is the source of human errors, many humans taught that they can achieve things without the creator,so they made ERRORS

DESCARTES argument are convincing Enough. The reason is that DESCARTES also proof this using the philosophy of humanity Which concerned human attribute. In human philosophy, powers

that preserve can't be possess by Humans and he also made use of "nothing comes from nothing" .In the philosophy of humans, it supports this as well.

3 0

3 years ago