If it were possible to move a star towards the earth then its apparent magnitude number would decrease while its absolute magnitude number would stay the same.
Definition of apparent magnitude:
The luminosity of a celestial body (such as a star) as observed from the earth compare absolute magnitude.
So for example, the apparent magnitude of the Sun is -26.7 and is the brightest celestial object we can see from Earth. However, if the Sun were 10 parsecs away, its apparent magnitude would be +4.7, only about as bright as Ganymede appears to us on Earth.
Definition of absolute magnitude:
Absolute magnitude is a measure of the luminosity of a celestial object on an inverse logarithmic astronomical magnitude scale.
To learn more about apparent magnitude here
brainly.com/question/2949443
#SPJ4
To solve this problem we will apply the linear motion kinematic equations, which describe the change in velocity, depending on the acceleration and the distance traveled, that is,
Where,
= Final Velocity
= Initial Velocity
a = Acceleration
h = height
Our values are given as,
Replacing we have,
Therefore the height of the cliff is 121ft
Answer: C
Explanation:
A bird flying in the air is 3D motion as the bird move up, down, right, left all the possible direction. A leaf falling from a tree is also a 3D motion because a leaf never fall in absolute vertical manner. A lady bug crawling on a soccer ball also 3D. If lady bug crawling on a plane like floor then it is 2D but now lady bug crawling on soccer ball which is in spherical shape so it is also 3D motion. Only train travelling along a track is 2D because train cannot move up and down and the track of train is in a plane. So it is 2D motion.
Answer:
B) Yes, but only those electrons with energy greater than the potential difference established between the grid and the collector will reach the collector.
Explanation:
In the case when the collector would held at a negative voltage i.e. small with regard to grid So yes the accelerated electrons would be reach to the collecting plate as the kinetic energy would be more than the potential energy that because of negative potential
so according to the given situation, the option b is correct
And, the rest of the options are wrong
a) 1.57 m/s
The sock spins once every 2.0 seconds, so its period is
T = 2.0 s
Therefore, the angular velocity of the sock is
The linear speed of the sock is given by
where
is the angular velocity
r = 0.50 m is the radius of the circular path of the sock
Substituting, we find:
B) Faster
In this case, the drum is twice as wide, so the new radius of the circular path of the sock is twice the previous one:
At the same time, the drum spins at the same frequency as before, therefore the angular frequency as not changed:
Therefore, the new linear speed would be:
And substituting,
So, we see that the linear speed has doubled.
