21
3*7times 7+7=14+7 =21
21 0 3-3=0
21/1 0/1 butterfly method 21*1=21 0*1 =1
21*1
=21 hope this helps
9514 1404 393
Answer:
1,570,000
Step-by-step explanation:
The sum is approximately ...
1,260,000 +310,000 = 1,570,000
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
It is a good idea to estimate the error associated with an estimate. Here, both numbers are rounded up by about 4000 each, so the estimate is around 8000 high.
Answer:
we cannot conclude hat the proportion of wives married less than two years who planned to have children is significantly higher than the proportion of wives married five years
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that in a study on the fertility of married women conducted by Martin O’Connell and Carolyn C. Rogers for the Census Bureau in 1979, two groups of childless wives aged 25 to 29 were selected at random, and each was asked if she eventually planned to have a child. One group was selected from among wives married less than two years and the other from among wives married five years.
Let X be the group married less than 2 years and Y less than 5 years
X Y Total
Sample size 300 300 600
Favouring 240 288 528
p 0.8 0.96 0.88

p difference = -0.16
Std error for difference = 
Test statistic = p difference/std error=-6.03
p value <0.000001
Since p is less than alpha 0.05 we cannot conclude hat the proportion of wives married less than two years who planned to have children is significantly higher than the proportion of wives married five years
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
both slopes multiply each others must equal to -1 for perpendicular.

Let m1 = 3/2

Therefore -2/3 is perpendicular to 3/2. Because the line passes through (6,-2)

Given (x1, y1) = ordered pair
Therefore (x1, y1) = (6,-2)
and m = - 2/3

Write in slope-intercept form.
