The smallest prime number of p for which p^3 + 4p^2 + 4p has exactly 30 positive divisors is 43.
<h3>What is the smallest prime number of p for which p must have exactly 30 positive divisors?</h3>
The smallest number of p in the polynomial equation p^3 + 4p^2 + 4p for which p must have exactly 30 divisors can be determined by factoring the polynomial expression, then equating it to the value of 30.
i.e.
By factorization, we have:
Now, to get exactly 30 divisor.
- (p+2)² requires to give us 15 factors.
Therefore, we can have an equation p + 2 = p₁ × p₂²
where:
- p₁ and p₂ relate to different values of odd prime numbers.
So, for the least values of p + 2, Let us assume that:
p + 2 = 5 × 3²
p + 2 = 5 × 9
p + 2 = 45
p = 45 - 2
p = 43
Therefore, we can conclude that the smallest prime number p such that
p^3 + 4p^2 + 4p has exactly 30 positive divisors is 43.
Learn more about prime numbers here:
brainly.com/question/145452
#SPJ1
Point <em>A</em> represents the complex conjugate z₁ and point L represents the complex conjugate of z₂ respectively
The complex conjugate of a complex number is a complex number that having equal magnitude in the real and imaginary part as the complex number to which it is a conjugate, but the imaginary part of the complex conjugate has an opposite sign to the original complex number
Therefore, graphically, the complex conjugate is a reflection of the original complex number across the x-axis because the transformation for a reflection of the point (x, y) across the x-axis is given as follows;
Preimage (x, y) reflected across the <em>x</em> axis give the image (x, -y)
Where in a complex number, we have;
x = The real part
y = The imaginary part
The reflection of z₁ across the x-axis gives the point <em>A</em>, while the reflection of z₂ across the x-axis gives the point <em>L</em>
Therefore;
Point <em>A</em> represents the complex conjugate z₁ and point L represents the complex conjugate of z₂
Learn more about complex numbers here;
brainly.com/question/20365080
In 1997 = 17697
Because, each year, the number of employees is expected to decrease by 2.2%, find 2.2% of 17697 and subtract from the number.
2.2/100 x 17697 = 38933.4/100 = 389.334
^that was calculating 2.2% of 17697. Now we subtract:
17697.000
- 389.334
17307.666 =
Round to the nearest whole number = 17308
Answer: in 1998, the expected number of workers is 17308
Six hundred ninty three thousand, five thousand six hundred ninty nine
Three hundred fourty thousand two thousand and eighty nine
I’m confused on the comma for the last 2?
Answer:
70/100
Step-by-step explanation:
You have 70 White socks
You have to add 70, 26, and 4.
When you add those, you get 100, making the answer 70/100
