1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kryger [21]
3 years ago
11

Two objects of the same mass travel in opposite directions along a horizontal surface. Object X has a speed of 5ms and object Y

has a speed of 5ms, as shown in the figure. After a period of time, object X collides with object Y. In scenario 1, the objects stick together after the collision. In scenario 2, the objects do not stick together after the collision.
Which of the following claims is true regarding how the outcome of scenario 1 is different from the outcome of scenario 2?
Physics
2 answers:
Papessa [141]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1

Explanation:

Because theyre heading opposite directions

alexdok [17]3 years ago
8 0
Since both objects are travelling in opposite directions at the same speed but eventually colliding with each other hence it is obvious that they are travelling in a circle.

Now, this question is regarding the conversation of momentum - elastic / in elastic collision.

Assuming the balls are in a closed system(an assumption that is consistent in your syllabus,unless stated otherwise)as the ball collides, momentum is conserved but some of the energy might be lost due to the collision either through heat / sound.

Summary:

3 types of collision.

1st type: Elastic collision
- No loss in Kinetic Energy
- No loss in momentum
- Balls do not stick together
Example: Bouncing Basketball, the ball comes back to your hand at the same height.

2nd type: Inelastic collision
- Loss in kinetic energy, (heat energy when in contact)
- No loss in momentum
- Balls do not stick together
Example: Bomb explosion.

3rd type: Perfectly Inelastic collision
- Maximum amount of KE is loss
- No loss in momentum
- Balls stick together
Example: Ballistic Pendulum
You might be interested in
Which statement is true about a planet’s orbital motion?
lana66690 [7]

Answer:

Orbital motion results when the object’s forward motion is balanced by a second object’s gravitational pull.

Explanation:

The gravitational force is responsible for the orbital motion of the planet, satellite, artificial satellite, and other heavenly bodies in outer space.

When an object is applied with a velocity that is equal to the velocity of the orbit at that location, the body continues to move forward. And, this motion is balanced by the gravitational pull of the second object.

The orbiting body experience a centripetal force that is equal to the gravitational force of the second object towards the body.

The velocity of the orbit is given by the relation,

                                    V = \sqrt{\frac{GM}{R + h} }

Where

                   V - velocity of the orbit at a height h from the surface

                    R - Radius of the second object

                    G - Gravitational constant

                    h - height from the surface

The body will be in orbital motion when its kinetic motion is balanced by gravitational force.

                         1/2 mV^{2} = GMm/R

Hence, the orbital motion results when the object’s forward motion is balanced by a second object’s gravitational pull.

3 0
3 years ago
A student connects a small solar panel to a 40 a resistor to make a simple circuit. The solar panel produces a voltage of 2 0.
Nastasia [14]
<h3>Solution for the above question : -</h3>

Ohm's law states that :

  • v = ir

the terms used are :

  • r = resistance
  • v = potential \:  \: difference
  • i  = current

let's solve for electric current :

  • 2 = i \times 40

  • i =  \dfrac{2}{40}

  • i = 0.05 \: A

  • i = 50 \: mA

\mathfrak{good\:  \: luck \:  \: for \:  \: your \:  \: assignment}

8 0
3 years ago
Radar use reflected microwaves to detect objects and measure their... what?
Sloan [31]
Height and depth..... for sure....

7 0
4 years ago
Which of the following best describes why understanding a watershed and its boundaries is important in designing housing develop
vagabundo [1.1K]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
A ray of light has a wavelength of
MArishka [77]

Answer:

The wavelength in vacuum is equal to 428.8 nm.

Explanation:

Given that,

The wavelength of light, \lambda=284\ nm

The refractive index of glass, n = 1.51

We need to find the wavelength in vacuum. The relation between wavelength and refractive index is given by :

n=\dfrac{\lambda_v}{\lambda}\\\\\lambda_v=n\times \lambda\\\\\lambda_v=1.51\times 284\\\\\lambda_v=428.8\ nm

So, the wavelength in vacuum is equal to 428.8 nm.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you were to walk toward a Van der Graaff generator, the effect of its electrical field would get weaker as you walked towards
    15·1 answer
  • An overhead projector lens is
    13·1 answer
  • An ice cube melts when its mechanical energy increases.
    13·2 answers
  • 1. An insect inside a bus flies from the back toward the front at 2 m/s. The bus is moving in a
    6·1 answer
  • A small sphere of radius R is arranged to pulsate so that its radius varies in simple harmonic motion between a minimum of R−x a
    13·1 answer
  • How many photons are emitted per second by a He−Ne laser that emits 1.5 mW of power at a wavelength λ=632.8nm. What is the frequ
    14·1 answer
  • A blank is a quality that has magnitude and direction
    7·1 answer
  • Think of something from everyday life that follows a two-dimensional path. It could be a kicked football, a bus that's turning a
    13·1 answer
  • A piano tuner is tuning a piano when he discovers that the G above middle C is vibrating with a higher frequency than his G tuni
    5·1 answer
  • A rebuttal that Rousseau would use to counter the King’s argument?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!