“The trapping of the suns warmth in a planets lower atmosphere, due to the greater transparency of the atmosphere to visible radiation from the sun than to infrared radiation emitted from the planets surface.”
Answer: The given substances are placed in order from most soluble in water to least soluble in water as follows.
>
>
> 
Explanation:
It is known that like dissolves like which means a polar compound will be soluble in a polar solvent. And, a non-polar compound will be soluble in non-polar solvent.
Ionic compounds are soluble in polar solvent like water. For example,
is an ionic compound and it is readily soluble in water.
2-butanol (
) is also a polar compound and it will also dissolve in water but to a lesser extent as compared to magnesium chloride.
Whereas both methane and propane are non-polar in nature. But as propane is larger in size as compared to methane so, it will be slightly more soluble in water as compared to methane.
Thus, we can conclude that the given substances are placed in order from most soluble in water to least soluble in water as follows.
>
>
> 
Kinetic energy=Ek
Ek=(1/2)mv²
Ek=480 J
v=8 m/s
mass=?
Ek=(1/2)mv²
480 J=(1/2)m(8 m/s)²
480 J=(32 m²/s²) m
m=(480 J)/(32 m²/s²)=15 kg
answer: the mass of the object is 15 kilograms.
Answer:

Explanation:
Hello there!
In this case, when considering weak acids which have an associated percent dissociation, we first need to set up the ionization reaction and the equilibrium expression:
![HA\rightleftharpoons H^++A^-\\\\Ka=\frac{[H^+][A^-]}{[HA]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=HA%5Crightleftharpoons%20H%5E%2B%2BA%5E-%5C%5C%5C%5CKa%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BH%5E%2B%5D%5BA%5E-%5D%7D%7B%5BHA%5D%7D)
Now, by introducing x as the reaction extent which also represents the concentration of both H+ and A-, we have:
![Ka=\frac{x^2}{[HA]_0-x} =10^{-4.74}=1.82x10^{-5}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Ka%3D%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E2%7D%7B%5BHA%5D_0-x%7D%20%3D10%5E%7B-4.74%7D%3D1.82x10%5E%7B-5%7D)
Thus, it is possible to find x given the pH as shown below:

So that we can calculate the initial concentration of the acid:
![\frac{(1.82x10^{-5})^2}{[HA]_0-1.82x10^{-5}} =1.82x10^{-5}\\\\\frac{1.82x10^{-5}}{[HA]_0-1.82x10^{-5}} =1\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%281.82x10%5E%7B-5%7D%29%5E2%7D%7B%5BHA%5D_0-1.82x10%5E%7B-5%7D%7D%20%3D1.82x10%5E%7B-5%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cfrac%7B1.82x10%5E%7B-5%7D%7D%7B%5BHA%5D_0-1.82x10%5E%7B-5%7D%7D%20%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C)
![[HA]_0=3.64x10^{-5}M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BHA%5D_0%3D3.64x10%5E%7B-5%7DM)
Therefore, the percent dissociation turns out to be:
![\% diss=\frac{x}{[HA]_0}*100\% \\\\\% diss=\frac{1.82x10^{-5}M}{3.64x10^{-5}M}*100\% \\\\\% diss = 50\%](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%25%20diss%3D%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7B%5BHA%5D_0%7D%2A100%5C%25%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%25%20diss%3D%5Cfrac%7B1.82x10%5E%7B-5%7DM%7D%7B3.64x10%5E%7B-5%7DM%7D%2A100%5C%25%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%25%20diss%20%3D%2050%5C%25)
Best regards!