Answer:
Baker argued that residents of his district were not receiving equal protection of the laws.
Tennessee argued that legislative redistricting was a political question that needed to be resolved by the legislative branch.
The case changed reapportionment of how people are represented throughout America.
Explanation:
Answered this question and got 100% :)
Answer:
judicial arrogance
Explanation:
Judicial arrogance refers to the irresponsible actions displayed by members of the justice department simply because they has the power to incorporate punishment to other citizens, making the citizens scared to oppose them event if they are making a violation.
This can be seen in judge Jones' actions. The most likely reason He constantly disrespect other people and wasting their time is because he know that there is very little chance he can get a consequences for his actions due to the position that the held as a judge.
Answer:
The Meiji Restoration, referred to at the time as the Honorable Restoration, and also known as the Meiji Renovation, Revolution, Reform, or Renewal, was an event that restored practical imperial rule to the Empire of Japan in 1868 under Emperor Meiji. Resulted in the dissolution of Japan's feudal system of government and the restoration of the imperial system.
Answer:B.) Olympic Games
Explanation: The 1996 Olympic games held in Atlanta, Georgia was one which had a significant impact on the growth and development of the state. The Olympic games is still till date one of the greatest sporting events in the world which is held in different countries of the world every 4 successive years. The immense improvement the Olympic games had on Atlanta includes ; the de elopement ond growth of business which includes erection of new apartment, hotel businesses in other to cater for foreigners who will be coming for the event. Also, expulsion of urban decay with the provision of streetlights, sidewalks and the enhancement and development of roadway and traffic strategy.
B. The decision affirmed the protection of symbolic speech.
In Schneck v. the United States (1919), the Court's resolution supported the limitation of symbolic speech in the form of anti-war brochures which inspired residents to resist the draft. In two following cases, Thornhill v. Alabama (1940) and Virginia v. Barnette (1943), the Court ordered in favor of First Amendment security for symbolic speech. By favouring the students, the Supreme Court guaranteed that the students had the right to free speech inside schools as long as it did not disturb the education process.
