Why might it be necessary to ignore some of the data points just before and just after the collision?

1 answer:

7 0

We have no idea. We need to examine the experimental set-up. You've given us no information, except that there may have been some sort of collision.

You might be interested in

I have a big test coming up and these two questions i don't understand: Choose the best answer: A device that transforms mechani

Jlenok [28]

1. B- electric generator

Although its really sometimes called an AC generator.

- i hoped i helped u :)

3 0

3 years ago

15) What is the frequency of a pendulum that is moving at 30 m/s with a wavelength of .35 m?

____ [38]

A pendulum is not a wave.

-- A pendulum doesn't have a 'wavelength'.

-- There's no way to define how many of its "waves" pass a point
every second.

-- Whatever you say is the speed of the pendulum, that speed
can only be true at one or two points in the pendulum's swing,
and it's different everywhere else in the swing.

-- The frequency of a pendulum depends only on the length
of the string from which it hangs.

If you take the given information and try to apply wave motion to it:

   Wave speed = (wavelength) x (frequency)

   Frequency = (speed) / (wavelength) ,

you would end up with

   Frequency = (30 meter/sec) / (0.35 meter) = 85.7 Hz

Have you ever seen anything that could be described as
a pendulum, swinging or even wiggling back and forth
85 times every second ? ! ?   That's pretty absurd.

This math is not applicable to the pendulum.

6 0

2 years ago

An electron with speed 2.45 x 10^7 m/s is traveling parallel to a uniform electric field of magnitude 1.18 x 10^4N/C . How much

cupoosta [38]

Answer:

time will elapse before it return to its staring point is 23.6 ns

Explanation:

given data

speed u = 2.45 × $10^{7}$ m/s