Answer:
no enough evidence to draw up a conclusion
Step-by-step explanation:
Data:
let: 
= decay after 2 weeks
= decay after 16 weeks
Making the hypotheses:
Null hypothesis; 
the deviation = 0.05
the standard difference = 4
Conditions:
The normal distribution curve can be plotted on a graph and the plot shows that the distribution is a skewed distribution.
Then,
Therefore, it can be concluded that 0.1983 > 0.05. This presents our failure to reject the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is not enough evidence to conclude that polyester decays more in less than 2 weeks.
This is the leineae making it a because it’s cubic
Each of the small pitcher will contain 4 cups of water while each of the large pitcher will contain 16 cups of water.
Therefore, two equal-sized large pitchers will hold 32 cups of water while the two equal-sized small pitchers will hold 8 cups of water
<h3>
Larger Pitchers</h3>
The 2 larger pitchers are equal in size.
Let
each size of the large pitcher = x
Two large size pitcher = 2x
<h3>
Smaller Pitchers</h3>
The 2 smaller pitchers are equal in size
let
each size of the pitcher = y
Two small sized pitchers = 2y
<h3>Pitchers Capacities</h3>
The whole pitchers holds 40 cups of water. Therefore,
The capacity of one large pitcher minus the capacity of one small pitcher is 12 cups. Therefore,
Combine the equations.
2x + 2y = 40
x - y = 12
x + y = 20
2y = 8
y = 8 / 2
y = 4
x - 4 = 12
x = 12 + 4
x = 16
learn more on geometry here: brainly.com/question/26109140?referrer=searchResults
We let the number of years that the two jobs will have the same payment be denoted as t. Equating the wages of these two jobs after t - 1 years will give us an equation of,
22,000 + 4000(t -1) = 26,000 + 2000(t - 1)
The value of t from the generated equation is 3. Therefore, after 3 years the jobs will be paying the same wages.
Yes because only 1/3 of the days are rainy days, which is about 4.67 days of rain.
