Option B is correct. If an incident light ray hits a flat, smooth object at 28°. It will reflect off at an angle of 28°.
<h3>What is the law of reflection?</h3>
The law of reflection specifies that upon reflection from a downy surface, the slope of the reflected ray is similar to the slope of the incident ray.
The reflected ray is consistently in the plane determined by the incident ray and perpendicular to the surface at the point of reference of the incident ray.
When the light rays descend on the smooth surface, the angle of reflection is similar to the angle of incidence, also the incident ray, the reflected ray, and the normal to the surface all lie in a similar plane.
If an incident light ray hits a flat, smooth object at 28 degrees, it will reflect off at an angle of 28°.
Hence, option B is correct
To learn more about the law of reflection, refer to the link;
brainly.com/question/12029226
#SPJ1
Answer:
a)
Weight in Air = 0.3N
Weight in Water = 0.25N
Weight in Liquid = 0.24N.
Upthrust /Buoyant Force = Weight in Air – Weight in Fluid(Water in this case)
= 0.3 – 0.25
= 0.5N.
b) R.D of Body = Density of Body/Density of Standard Fluid(Water).
There's a Derived Formula for RD.
I'm gonna Apply it here.
Ask me for the derivation in the Comment section if you need it.
RD = α/ρ = (Weight in Air) / (Upthrust Force)
Where
α = density of the Body(or reference substance)
ρ = density of standard fluid (water)
= 0.3/0.05 = 6.
c) RD of Liquid = (Density of Liquid) /(Density of standard Fluid(water)
Or we just go by that formula
RD of Liquid = Weight in Air/Upthrust(In Liquid)
We'll be using the Upthrust in that Liquid now.
= 0.3 – 0.24 = 0.06
RD = 0.3/0.06 = 5.
You asked a question. I'm about to answer it.
Sadly, I can almost guarantee that you won't understand the solution.
This realization grieves me, but there is little I can do to change it.
My explanation will be the best of which I'm capable.
Here are the Physics facts I'll use in the solution:
-- "Apparent magnitude" means how bright the star appears to us.
-- "Absolute magnitude" means the how bright the star WOULD appear
if it were located 32.6 light years from us (10 parsecs).
-- A change of 5 magnitudes means a 100 times change in brightness,
so each magnitude means brightness is multiplied or divided by ⁵√100 .
That's about 2.512... .
-- Increasing magnitude means dimmer.
Decreasing magnitude means brighter.
+5 is 10 magnitudes dimmer than -5 .
-- Apparent brightness is inversely proportional to the square
of the distance from the source (just like gravity, sound, and
the force between charges).
That's all the Physics. The rest of the solution is just arithmetic.
____________________________________________________
-- The star in the question would appear M(-5) at a distance of
32.6 light years.
-- It actually appears as a M(+5). That's 10 magnitudes dimmer than M(-5),
because of being farther away than 32.6 light years.
-- 10 magnitudes dimmer is ( ⁵√100)⁻¹⁰ = (100)^(-2) .
-- But brightness varies as the inverse square of distance,
so that exponent is (negative double) the ratio of the distances,
and the actual distance to the star is
(32.6) · (100)^(1) light years
= (32.6) · (100) light years
= approx. 3,260 light years . (roughly 1,000 parsecs)
I'll have to confess that I haven't done one of these calculations
in over 50 years, and I'm not really that confident in my result.
If somebody's health or safety depended on it, or the success of
a space mission, then I'd be strongly recommending that you get
a second opinion.
But, quite frankly, I do feel that mine is worth the 5 points.
Warm air expands and rises up while cold air condenses and sinks.
Hopefully I could help :)
