Answer:
Explanation:
This problem relates to interference of light in thin films .
The condition of bright fringe in thin films which is sandwitched by two layers of medium having lesser refractive index is as follows.
2nt = (2n+1) λ / 2 , n is refractive index of thin layer , t is its thickness , λ is wavelength of light .
2 x 1.5 t = λ / 2 , if n = 0 for minimum thickness.
2 x 1.5 t = 600 / 2 nm
t = 100 nm .
Explanation:
The temperature must be hot enough to allow the ions of deuterium and tritium to have enough kinetic energy to overcome the Coulomb barrier and fuse together. The ions must be confined with a high ion density to achieve a suitable fusion reaction rate.
There's a very subtle thing going on here, one that could blow your mind.
Wherever we look in the universe, no matter what direction we look,
we see the light from distant galaxies arriving at our telescopes with
longer wavelengths than the light SHOULD have.
The only way we know of right now that can cause light waves to get
longer after they leave the source is motion of the source away from
the observer. The lengthening of the waves on account of that motion
is called the Doppler effect. (The answer to the question is choice-c.)
But that may not be the only way that light waves can get stretched. It's
the only way we know of so far, and so we say that the distant galaxies
are all moving away from us.
From that, we say the whole universe is expanding, and that right there is
one of the strongest observations that we explain with the Big Bang theory
of creation.
Now: If ... say tomorrow ... a competent Physicist discovers another way
for light waves to get stretched after they leave the source, then the whole
"expanding universe" idea is out the window, and probably the Big Bang
theory along with it !
Now that our mind has been blown, come back down to Earth with me,
and I'll give you something else to think about:
It's true that when we look at distant galaxies, we do see their light
arriving in our telescopes with longer wavelengths than it should have.
And then we use the Doppler effect to calculate how fast that galaxy
is moving away from us. That's all true. Astronomers are doing it
every day. I mean every night.
So here's the question for you to think about ... maybe even READ about:
When the light from a distant galaxy pours into our telescope, and we
look at it, and we measure its wavelength, and we find that the wavelength
is longer than it should be ... how do we know what it should be ? ? ?
Answer:
The minimum possible coefficient of static friction between the tires and the ground is 0.64.
Explanation:
if the μ is the coefficient of static friction and R is radius of the curve and v is the speed of the car then, one thing we know is that along the curve, the frictional force, f will be equal to the centripedal force, Fc and this relation is :
Fc = f
m×(v^2)/(R) = μ×m×g
(v^2)/(R) = g×μ
μ = (v^2)/(R×g)
= ((25)^2)/((100)×(9.8))
= 0.64
Therefore, the minimum possible coefficient of static friction between the tires and the ground is 0.64.
It is dependent upon the object's mass. The greater the mass of the object greater will be the inertia of the object, and hence it's resistance to change in motion as well.
