Answer:
Explanation:
Although there is absolutely NO regard for significant digits, I can help you with this, nonetheless.
The equation for Potential Energy is PE = mgh. We have everything but the height of the ball. We have to solve for that using a one-dimensional motion equation:
v² = v₀² + 2aΔx, where Δx is our displacement (the height we need for PE). Filling in and keeping in mind that at the max height of parabolic travel, the final velocity of the object is 0:
0 = (21.5)² + 2(-9.8)Δx and
0 = 462.25 - 19.6Δx and
-462.25 = -19.6Δx so
Δx = 23.58 m. Using this as the h in our PE equation:
PE = .19(9.8)(23.58) so
PE = 43.9 J, choice C.
Answer:
the claim is not valid or reasonable.
Explanation:
In order to test the claim we will find the maximum and actual efficiencies. maximum efficiency of a heat engine can be found as:
η(max) = 1 - T₁/T₂
where,
η(max) = maximum efficiency = ?
T₁ = Sink Temperature = 300 K
T₂ = Source Temperature = 400 K
Therefore,
η(max) = 1 - 300 K/400 K
η(max) = 0.25 = 25%
Now, we calculate the actual frequency of the engine:
η = W/Q
where,
W = Net Work = 250 KJ
Q = Heat Received = 750 KJ
Therefore,
η = 250 KJ/750 KJ
η = 0.333 = 33.3 %
η > η(max)
The actual efficiency of a heat engine can never be greater than its Carnot efficiency or the maximum efficiency.
<u>Therefore, the claim is not valid or reasonable.</u>
I would say your answer is B- Some of the chemical energy from the batteries is converted into heat energy.
No,because a Kevin is 7.242971666663E+22 times Smaller than a Joule.
