i dont know did you.......
Density is mass divided by volume. Therefore, volume is mass divided by density.
hi im breanna
Answer:
The mole is simply a very large number that is used by chemists as a unit of measurement.
Explanation:
The mole is simply a very large number,
6.022
×
10
23
, that has a special property. If I have
6.022
×
10
23
hydrogen atoms, I have a mass of 1 gram of hydrogen atoms . If I have
6.022
×
10
23
H
2
molecules, I have a mass of 2 gram of hydrogen molecules. If I have
6.022
×
10
23
C
atoms, I have (approximately!) 12 grams.
The mole is thus the link between the micro world of atoms and molecules, and the macro world of grams and litres, the which we can easily measure by mass or volume. The masses for a mole of each element are given on the periodic table as the atomic weight. So, if have 12 g of
C
, I know, fairly precisely, how many atoms of carbon I have. Given this quantity, I know how many molecules of
O
2
are required to react with the
C
, which I could measure by mass or by volume.
The hypothesis is that salt water freezes faster than fresh water.
The dependent variable is time taken for ice to appear.
The independent variable is presence or absence of salt
The constants are the amount of water in each tray, freezing conditions and length of time of exposure to freezing condition.
The control group is the tray to which salt was not added
The experimental group is the tray to which salt was added
The presence of solutes in a solution causes the freezing point depression.
A solution is made up of a solute and a solvent. In the presence of a solute, the freezing point of a pure solvent is decreased. This is because freezing point is a colligative property.
Colligative properties depend on the amount of solute present.
Hence, the pure water freezes faster (ice begin to appear earlier) than the salt water.
The hypothesis put forward in this experiment was found to be invalid by the experiment.
For more about colligative properties, see
brainly.com/question/10323760
Question: Baking a Cake Without Flour.
Hypothesis: I think that when I remove the flour from the standard cake recipe, I'll end up with a flat but tasty cake.
Procedure: I baked two cakes during my experiment. For my control, I baked a cake following a normal recipe. I used the Double Fudge Cake recipe on page 292 of the Betty Crocker Cookbook. For my experimental cake, I followed the same recipe but left out the flour. I first obtained a 2-quart mixing bowl.
Results: My control cake, which I cooked for 25 minutes, measured 4 cm high. Eight out of ten tasters that I picked at random from the class found it to be an acceptable dessert. After 25 minutes of baking, my experimental cake was 1.5 cm high and all ten tasters refused to eat it because it was burnt to a crisp.
What did I learn?/Conclusion: Since the experimental cake burned, my results did not support my hypothesis. I think that the cake burned because it had less mass, but cooked for the same amount of time. I propose that the baking time be shortened in subsequent trials.
-
I hope this helped :))
