Answer: option B
Explanation: when a neutral atom loses an electron or gains a positive charge electron, it becomes a positive ion (positively charged) and when an neutral atom gains an electronic charge or losses a positive charge electron, it becomes a negative ion (negatively charged).
The sound mixer will need to increase the amplitude of the sound wave produced by the singer which will increase the loudness of the sound.
<h3>Amplitude of sound wave</h3>
The amplitude of a sound wave is the maximum vertical displacement of the sound wave.
The sound mixer will need to increase the amplitude of the sound wave produced by the singer.
The increase in the amplitude of the sound wave produced by the lower tune singer will result in increased loudness of the sound.
Thus, the sound mixer will need to increase the amplitude of the sound wave produced by the singer which will increase the loudness of the sound.
Learn more about sound waves here: brainly.com/question/1199084
Answer: 321 J
Explanation:
Given
Mass of the box 
Force applied is 
Displacement of the box is 
Velocity acquired by the box is 
acceleration associated with it is 

Work done by force is 

change in kinetic energy is 

According to work-energy theorem, work done by all the forces is equal to the change in the kinetic energy
![\Rightarrow W+W_f=\Delta K\quad [W_f=\text{Work done by friction}]\\\\\Rightarrow 375+W_f=54\\\Rightarrow W_f=-321\ J](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CRightarrow%20W%2BW_f%3D%5CDelta%20K%5Cquad%20%5BW_f%3D%5Ctext%7BWork%20done%20by%20friction%7D%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20375%2BW_f%3D54%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20W_f%3D-321%5C%20J)
Therefore, the magnitude of work done by friction is 
Length of the pipe = 0.39 m
Number of harmonics = 3
Now there are 3 loops so here we can say


now here at the center of the pipe it will form Node
we need to find the distance of nearest antinode
So distance between node and its nearest antinode will be


So the distance will be 6.5 cm
Explanation:
The US Supreme Court has affirmed in Miller v. Johnson (1995) that racial gerrymandering is a violation of constitutional rights and upheld decisions against redistricting that is purposely devised based on race. However, the Supreme Court has struggled as to when partisan gerrymandering occurs (Vieth v.