1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valkas [14]
3 years ago
5

Where would radicals come in the order of operations? Explain why.

Mathematics
1 answer:
larisa86 [58]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

exponents, multiplication division addition and subtraction and radicals. They're gonna come right here with exponents on.

Step-by-step explanation:

The reason for this is because radicals, for example, X to the power or this very day vaccine is the same as X to the power of one. The humor to perhaps is the same as actually the power of 1/3. So really any radical can be expressed is an exploded as well. So this is why radicals are grouped with exponents right here. So after Grant sees in priority, but before multiplication and division

You might be interested in
Solve for X<br> A) 13<br> B) 5<br> C) 14<br> D) 1
Drupady [299]

Answer:

B) 5

Circle is 360 degr. So (21x+9) +(23x-5) +(26x+6)=360

Combine like terms 70x+10=360

Additive inverse -10 from both sides, 70x= 350

Divide both side by 70 division Property of Equality x=5.

Check your answer by substituting 5 back into original solution!

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
A customer wants to purchase a pair of shoes that cost $45 and the state sales tax is 7%.
Rasek [7]

Answer:

$22.84

Step-by-step explanation:

The tax is calculated by 0.075 * 21.25 = 1.59375 or $1.59. So the total bill is the cost of items purchased plus tax, which is $21.25 + $1.59 = $22.84.

3 0
3 years ago
marking brainlist. please help What is the first inverse operation for the following problem? 3x+4=12
Strike441 [17]

Answer:

3x + 4 = 12 :- x = 8 / 3

Step-by-step explanation:

3x + 4 = 12

Move all terms not containing x to the right side of the equation.

Subtract 4 from both sides of the equation.

3x = 12 - 4

Subtract 4 from 12.

3x = 8

Divide each term by 3 and simplify.

Divide each term in 3x = 8 by 3.

3x / 3 = 8 / 3

Cancel the common factor of 3.

Divide x by 1.

x = 8 / 3

The result can be shown in multiple forms.

Exact Form:

x = 8 / 3

Decimal Form:

x = 2.6

Mixed Number Form:

x = 2 2/3

3 0
3 years ago
Find the missing value when given the modulus.
kolbaska11 [484]

Solving the complex number, we get the value of the missing value that is ‘a’ = -6

We  have been given the expression as

          |a – i| = √37          (1)

Which is an expression of complex number. The general expression of complex number is given as

    z = x + iy

 where x is the real part and iy is the imaginary part

To find the modulus value, the formula is given by,

  |z| = |x + iy|

   |z| = √[(real part)2 + (imaginary part)2]

 |z| = √(x2 + y2)

According to the question, |z| = √37         (2)

Equating equation (1) and (2), we get

√(a2 + 1) = √37

(a2 + 1) = 37

a2 = 37 – 1

a2 = 36

a = √36

a = ±6

Now value of a can be 6 or -6. We have been given that the modulus is in third quadrant.

Hence the value will be negative. Therefore, the missing value will be -6.

Learn more about complex number here : brainly.com/question/5564133

#SPJ9

3 0
2 years ago
Explain how the difference of a fraction or a rational number and its additive inverse is equal to zero.
Jobisdone [24]
This question is in reverse (in two ways): 

<span>1. The definition of an additive inverse of a number is precisely that which, when added to the number, will give a sum of zero. </span>

<span>The real problem, in certain fields, is usually to show that for all numbers in that field, there exists an additive inverse. </span>

<span>Therefore, if you tell me that you have a number, and its additive inverse, and you plan to add them together, then I can tell you in advance that the sum MUST be zero. </span>

<span>2. In your question, you use the word "difference", which does not work (unless the number is zero - 0 is an integer AND a rational number, and its additive inverse is -0 which is the same as 0 - the difference would be 0 - -0 = 0). </span>

<span>For example, given the number 3, and its additive inverse -3, if you add them, you get zero: </span>
<span>3 + (-3) = 0 </span>

<span>However, their "difference" will be 6 (or -6, depending which way you do the difference): </span>

<span>3 - (-3) = 6 </span>
<span>-3 - 3 = -6 </span>

<span>(because -3 is a number in the integers, then it has an additive inverse, also in the integers, of +3). </span>

<span>--- </span>

<span>A rational number is simply a number that can be expressed as the "ratio" of two integers. For example, the number 4/7 is the ratio of "four to seven". </span>

<span>It can be written as an endless decimal expansion </span>
<span>0.571428571428571428....(forever), but that does not change its nature, because it CAN be written as a ratio, it is "rational". </span>

<span>Integers are rational numbers as well (because you can always write 3/1, the ratio of 3 to 1, to express the integer we call "3") </span>

<span>The additive inverse of a rational number, written as a ratio, is found by simply flipping the sign of the numerator (top) </span>

<span>The additive inverse of 4/7 is -4/7 </span>

<span>and if you ADD those two numbers together, you get zero (as per the definition of "additive inverse") </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>If you need to "prove" it, you begin by the existence of additive inverses in the integers. </span>
<span>ALL integers each have an additive inverse. </span>
<span>For example, the additive inverse of 4 is -4 </span>

<span>Next, show that this (in the integers) can be applied to the rationals in this manner: </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = ? </span>
<span>common denominator, therefore you can factor out the denominator: </span>

<span>(4 + -4)/7 = ? </span>
<span>Inside the bracket is the sum of an integer with its additive inverse, therefore the sum is zero </span>
<span>(0)/7 = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>Since this is true for ALL integers, then it must also be true for ALL rational numbers.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Abigail has a green,yellow,and purple shirt to mach with either a white,black,or red pair of pants.How many different shirt and
    13·1 answer
  • Explain the difference between solving 2x+15-3x=10 and 2x-4=3x+11
    11·1 answer
  • If a and b are positive constants and if a(x-y) = b(y-x), what is the value of the ratio of x/y?
    5·1 answer
  • Josefina is inscribing a square in a circle with center c. She first uses a straight edge to draw a diameter of the circle throu
    6·2 answers
  • Grace has a 15 inch diameter bicycle tire. How many revolutions will it make traveling 500 feet?
    13·1 answer
  • What term must be added to x2 + 5x to complete the square? Explain how you<br> found the term.
    10·1 answer
  • The quotient of 10 and 2
    5·2 answers
  • Please help ASAP this is due very soon and I need help.
    9·1 answer
  • Given that a random variable X has a geometric distribution that X- Geometry 0.67. Find the mean​
    11·2 answers
  • The triangles are similar.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!