The wavelengths of the constituent travelling waves CANNOT be 400 cm.
The given parameters:
- <em>Length of the string, L = 100 cm</em>
<em />
The wavelengths of the constituent travelling waves is calculated as follows;
for first mode: n = 1
for second mode: n = 2
For the third mode: n = 3
For fourth mode: n = 4
Thus, we can conclude that, the wavelengths of the constituent travelling waves CANNOT be 400 cm.
The complete question is below:
A string of length 100 cm is held fixed at both ends and vibrates in a standing wave pattern. The wavelengths of the constituent travelling waves CANNOT be:
A. 400 cm
B. 200 cm
C. 100 cm
D. 67 cm
E. 50 cm
Learn more about wavelengths of travelling waves here: brainly.com/question/19249186
Let's calculate the momentum of Fiona, given by the product between its mass and its speed:
Now let's compare it with the momentum of the other animals:
a) the mass of the sea turtle is missing, so we cannot calculate its momentum.
b) the momentum of the dolphin is
c) the momentum of the horse is
d) the momentum of the lion is
And we can see that the correct answer is b), because the momentum of the dolphin is greater than the momentum of Fiona.
That's a great idea ! A wind turbine (windmill) or solar panels
on the roof of every WalMart, but don't stop there. Let K-Mart,
Target, Sears, Macy's, 7-11, McDonald's, and Subway in on it too.
In fact, why not place them on the roof of every house and
apartment building too ?
Just one question: Who's going to pay for them ?
_________________________________________________
The biggest single year-round residential use of energy in the
USA is to heat up and keep a ready supply of hot water. So the
single biggest residential use of energy could be eliminated with
a simple solar water heater on the roof of every house. From my
own personal observation, I know that Israel is there now, but here
in the USA, it's apparently not worth the time, effort, or expense ! ? !
Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted anexperiment<span> focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials.</span>
