Answer:
Option B. 3.0×10¯¹¹ F.
Explanation:
The following data were obtained from the question:
Potential difference (V) = 100 V.
Charge (Q) = 3.0×10¯⁹ C.
Capacitance (C) =..?
The capacitance, C of a capacitor is simply defined as the ratio of charge, Q on either plates to the potential difference, V between them. Mathematically, it is expressed as:
Capacitance (C) = Charge (Q) / Potential difference (V)
C = Q/V
With the above formula, we can obtain the capacitance of the parallel plate capacitor as follow:
Potential difference (V) = 100 V.
Charge (Q) = 3.0×10¯⁹ C.
Capacitance (C) =..?
C = Q/V
C = 3.0×10¯⁹ / 100
C = 3.0×10¯¹¹ F.
Therefore, the capacitance of the parallel plate capacitor is 3.0×10¯¹¹ F.
Answer:at 21.6 min they were separated by 12 km
Explanation:
We can consider the next diagram
B2------15km/h------->Dock
|
|
B1 at 20km/h
|
|
V
So by the time B1 leaves, being B2 traveling at constant 15km/h and getting to the dock one hour later means it was at 15km from the dock, the other boat, B1 is at a distance at a given time, considering constant speed of 20km/h*t going south, where t is in hours, meanwhile from the dock the B2 is at a distance of (15km-15km/h*t), t=0, when it is 8pm.
Then we have a right triangle and the distance from boat B1 to boat B2, can be measured as the square root of (15-15*t)^2 +(20*t)^2. We are looking for a minimum, then we have to find the derivative with respect to t. This is 5*(25*t-9)/(sqrt(25*t^2-18*t+9)), this derivative is zero at t=9/25=0,36 h = 21.6 min, now to be sure it is a minimum we apply the second derivative criteria that states that if the second derivative at the given critical point is positive it means here we have a minimum, and by calculating the second derivative we find it is 720/(25 t^2 - 18 t + 9)^(3/2) that is positive at t=9/25, then we have our answer. And besides replacing the value of t we get the distance is 12 km.
23.5 DEGREES is the answer.
Answer:
the electric field strength on the second one is 2.67 N/C.
Explanation:
the electric fiel on the first one is:
E1 = k×q/(r^2)
r^2 = k×q/(E1)
= (9×10^9)×(q)/(24.0)
= 375000000q
then the electric field on the second one is:
E2 = k×q/(R^2)
we know that R = 3r
R^2 = 9×r^2
E2 = k×q/(9×r^2)
= k×q/(9×375000000q)
= k/(9×375000000)
= (9×10^9)/(9×375000000)
= 2.67 N/C
Therefore, the electric field strength on the second one is 2.67 N/C.
