1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pavlova-9 [17]
3 years ago
11

Name 3 renewable energy resources

Physics
2 answers:
Ad libitum [116K]3 years ago
7 0
Solar energy, wind energy, hydro energy
babymother [125]3 years ago
3 0
Tidal power, hydroelectricity, biomass
You might be interested in
the net external force on the 24-kg mower is stated to be 51 N. If the force of friction opposing the motion is 24 N, what force
-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

PART A)

External force will be 75 N

PART B)

distance moved will be 1.125 m

Explanation:

PART A)

Given that net force on the mower is

F_{net} = 51 N

now we also know that friction force due to ground is given as

F_f = 24 N

now we have

F_{net} = F_{ext} - F_f

51 = F_{ext} - 24

F_{ext} = 75 N

so external force will be 75 N

PART B)

deceleration due to friction when external force is removed from it

a = \frac{F_f}{m}

a = \frac{24}{24} = 1 m/s^2

now we can find the distance by kinematics

v_f^2 - v_i^2 = 2 a d

0 - 1.5^2 = 2(-1)d

d = 1.125 m

so the distance moved will be 1.125 m

6 0
3 years ago
Show that rigid body rotation near the Galactic center is consistent with a spherically symmetric mass distribution of constant
irakobra [83]

To solve this problem we will use the concepts related to gravitational acceleration and centripetal acceleration. The equality between these two forces that maintains the balance will allow to determine how the rigid body is consistent with a spherically symmetric mass distribution of constant density. Let's start with the gravitational acceleration of the Star, which is

a_g = \frac{GM}{R^2}

Here

M = \text{Mass inside the Orbit of the star}

R = \text{Orbital radius}

G = \text{Universal Gravitational Constant}

Mass inside the orbit in terms of Volume and Density is

M =V \rho

Where,

V = Volume

\rho =Density

Now considering the volume of the star as a Sphere we have

V = \frac{4}{3} \pi R^3

Replacing at the previous equation we have,

M = (\frac{4}{3}\pi R^3)\rho

Now replacing the mass at the gravitational acceleration formula we have that

a_g = \frac{G}{R^2}(\frac{4}{3}\pi R^3)\rho

a_g = \frac{4}{3} G\pi R\rho

For a rotating star, the centripetal acceleration is caused by this gravitational acceleration.  So centripetal acceleration of the star is

a_c = \frac{4}{3} G\pi R\rho

At the same time the general expression for the centripetal acceleration is

a_c = \frac{\Theta^2}{R}

Where \Theta is the orbital velocity

Using this expression in the left hand side of the equation we have that

\frac{\Theta^2}{R} = \frac{4}{3}G\pi \rho R^2

\Theta = (\frac{4}{3}G\pi \rho R^2)^{1/2}

\Theta = (\frac{4}{3}G\pi \rho)^{1/2}R

Considering the constant values we have that

\Theta = \text{Constant} \times R

\Theta \propto R

As the orbital velocity is proportional to the orbital radius, it shows the rigid body rotation of stars near the galactic center.

So the rigid-body rotation near the galactic center is consistent with a spherically symmetric mass distribution of constant density

6 0
3 years ago
Gary saved dimes and nickels at a ratio of 5:7. Then, he saved 20% more dimes and 3 times the original number of nickels. If he
TiliK225 [7]

Answer:

i think 53 or 56

Explanation:

cause i cross multiplied and got that

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which goes into which category?
Pavel [41]

Evidence of Chemical Change:

A car rusting

Leaves changing in October

The glow of a light bulb

A white cloudy substance occurs after mixing two substances

Burning toasts

A candle being lit

Evidence of Physical Change:

Water boiling

Yellow and blue paints mixed together

Wax melting

Crushing a rock with a hammer

Hope this helps!

Have a great day!

6 0
4 years ago
Explain why it is important to keep all variables that might affect the dependent variable, other than the manipulated variable
Inga [223]
<span>You have multiple confounding variables, you cannot accurately conclude the relationship between the manipulated and dependent variable because the other variables that are not controlled for could be the reason for seeing a certain change</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Where did the elements in our solar system come from? they condensed out of hot gas clouds surrounding the early sun. they were
    11·1 answer
  • A sphere mass m1 and a block of mass m2 are connected by a light cord that passes over a pulley. The radius of the pulley is R,
    12·1 answer
  • Match the following.
    5·1 answer
  • HELP!! Worth a lot of points :) <br> (Physics question)
    8·2 answers
  • Suppose a balloon was tied to a pole. What happens?
    10·1 answer
  • A tiger is running across a field. What would happen if the hydrogen ion pumps into the tigers mitochondria stopped functioning
    5·1 answer
  • What voltage would be measured across the 15 ohm resistor?
    11·2 answers
  • What is the ideal mechanical advantage of a lift that allows you raise a 90.0-kg refrigerator with 80.0 N of force?
    5·1 answer
  • Which measurement is used to determine if an object has balanced forces
    13·1 answer
  • What factors affect the strength and direction of electrical forces?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!