Answer:
PART A)
External force will be 75 N
PART B)
distance moved will be 1.125 m
Explanation:
PART A)
Given that net force on the mower is

now we also know that friction force due to ground is given as

now we have



so external force will be 75 N
PART B)
deceleration due to friction when external force is removed from it


now we can find the distance by kinematics



so the distance moved will be 1.125 m
To solve this problem we will use the concepts related to gravitational acceleration and centripetal acceleration. The equality between these two forces that maintains the balance will allow to determine how the rigid body is consistent with a spherically symmetric mass distribution of constant density. Let's start with the gravitational acceleration of the Star, which is

Here



Mass inside the orbit in terms of Volume and Density is

Where,
V = Volume
Density
Now considering the volume of the star as a Sphere we have

Replacing at the previous equation we have,

Now replacing the mass at the gravitational acceleration formula we have that


For a rotating star, the centripetal acceleration is caused by this gravitational acceleration. So centripetal acceleration of the star is

At the same time the general expression for the centripetal acceleration is

Where
is the orbital velocity
Using this expression in the left hand side of the equation we have that



Considering the constant values we have that


As the orbital velocity is proportional to the orbital radius, it shows the rigid body rotation of stars near the galactic center.
So the rigid-body rotation near the galactic center is consistent with a spherically symmetric mass distribution of constant density
Answer:
i think 53 or 56
Explanation:
cause i cross multiplied and got that
Evidence of Chemical Change:
A car rusting
Leaves changing in October
The glow of a light bulb
A white cloudy substance occurs after mixing two substances
Burning toasts
A candle being lit
Evidence of Physical Change:
Water boiling
Yellow and blue paints mixed together
Wax melting
Crushing a rock with a hammer
Hope this helps!
Have a great day!
<span>You have multiple confounding variables, you cannot accurately conclude the relationship between the manipulated and dependent variable because the other variables that are not controlled for could be the reason for seeing a certain change</span>