Answer:
439.7nm
Explanation:
Energy of a quantum can be calculated using below formula
E=hv...........eqn(1)
But v=λ/ c .........eqn(2)
If we substitute eqn(2) into eqn(1) we have
E= hc/(λ)
Where E= energy
h= Plank's constant= 6.62607004 × 10-34 m2 kg / s
c= speed of light
c= 2.998 × 10^8 m/s
λ= wavelength= ?
But the energy was given in Kj , it must be converted to Kj/ photon for unit consistency.
Energy E= 272 kJ/mol × 1mol/6.02× 10^23
Energy= 451.83× 10^-24 Kj/ photon
E= hc/(λ)...........eqn(1)
If we make λ subject of the formula
λ= hc/E
Then substitute the values we have
λ= [(6.626 × 10^-34) × (2.998 × 10^8)]/451.83× 10^-24
λ=(0.00043965) × (1Kj/1000J) × (10^9nm/1m)
λ=439.7nm
Hence, the longest wavelength of radiation with enough energy to break carbon-sulfur bonds is 439.7nm
This problem is simply converting the concentration from molality to molarity. Molality has units of mol solute/kg solvent, while molarity has units of mol solute/L solution.
2.24 mol H2SO4/kg H2O * (0.25806 kg H2SO4/mol H2SO4) = 0.578 kg H2SO4/kg H2O
That means the solution weighs a total of 1 kg + 0.578 kg = 1.578 kg. Then, convert it to liters using the density data:
1.578 kg * (1000g / 1kg) * (1 mL/1.135 g) = 1390 mL or 1.39 L.
Hence, the molarity is
2.24/1.39 = 1.61 M
Metal because it’s more stronger
Answer ; The correct answer is : 346 m/s .
Sound is a type of longitudinal wave , which is produced when a matter compress or refracts .
Speed of sounds depends on factors like medium , density , temperature etc .
Effect of Temperature on speed of sounds :
When the temperature increases , molecules gains energy and they starts vibrating and with higher temperature vibration becomes fast . So the waves of sounds can travel faster due to faster vibrations . Hence , speed of sounds is directly proportional to the temperature or speed of sounds increases with increase in temperature .
The speed of sounds at 0⁰C is 331 
The relation between speed of sound and temperature is given as :

Given : Temperature = 25 ⁰ C
Plugging values in formula =>



Yes..? I don’t understand what you’re trying to ask mate.