How can I skip more helppppppppppppppppppppppp
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
a) For this case the new time to run the FP operation would be reduced 20% so that means 100-20% =80% from the original time
The reduction on this case is
And since the new total time would be given by
b) For this case the total time is reduced 20% so that means that the new total time would be (1-0.2)=0.8 times the original total time
The original time for INT operations is calculated as:
For this part the only time that was changed is assumed the INT operations so then:
And then:
c) A reduction of the total time implies that the total time would be 205 s from the results above. And the time for FP is 70, for L/S is 85 and for INT operations is 55 s, so then if we add 70+85+55=210s, we see that 210>205 so then we cannot reduce the total time 20% just reducing the branch intructions.
Explanation:
From the info given we know that a computer running a program that requires 250 s, with 70 s spent executing FP instructions, 85 s executed L/S instructions and 40 s spent executing branch instructions.
Part 1
For this case the new time to run the FP operation would be reduced 20% so that means 100-20% =80% from the original time
The reduction on this case is
And since the new total time would be given by
Part 2
For this case the total time is reduced 20% so that means that the new total time would be (1-0.2)=0.8 times the original total time
The original time for INT operations is calculated as:
For this part the only time that was changed is assumed the INT operations so then:
And then:
And we can quantify the decrease using the relative change:
of reduction
Part 3
A reduction of the total time implies that the total time would be 205 s from the results above. And the time for FP is 70, for L/S is 85 and for INT operations is 55 s, so then if we add 70+85+55=210s, we see that 210>205 so then we cannot reduce the total time 20% just reducing the branch intructions.
Answer:
The value of heat transferred watt per foot length Q = 54.78 Watt per foot length.
Explanation:
Diameter of pipe = 2 in = 0.0508 m
Steam temperature = 300 F = 422.04 K
Duct temperature = 70 F = 294.26 K
Emmisivity of surface 1 = 0.79
Emmisivity of surface 2 = 0.276
Net emmisivity of both surfaces ∈ = 0.25
Stefan volazman constant = 5.67 ×
Heat transfer per foot length is given by
Q = ∈ A (
) ------ (1)
Put all the values in equation (1) , we get
Q = 0.25 × 5.67 × × 3.14 × 0.0508 × 1 × (
)
Q = 54.78 Watt per foot.
This is the value of heat transferred watt per foot length.