1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katena32 [7]
3 years ago
9

Parallel / Perpendicular Practice

Mathematics
1 answer:
deff fn [24]3 years ago
6 0

The slope and intercept form is the form of the straight line equation that includes the value of the slope of the line

  1. Neither
  2. ║
  3. Neither
  4. ⊥
  5. ║
  6. Neither
  7. Neither
  8. Neither

Reason:

The slope and intercept form is the form y = m·x + c

Where;

m = The slope

Two equations are parallel if their slopes are equal

Two equations are perpendicular if the relationship between their slopes, m₁, and m₂ are; m_1 = -\dfrac{1}{m_2}

1. The given equations are in the slope and intercept form

\ y = 3 \cdot x + 1

The slope, m₁ = 3

y = \dfrac{1}{3} \cdot x + 1

The slope, m₂ = \dfrac{1}{3}

Therefore, the equations are <u>neither</u> parallel or perpendicular

  • Neither

2. y = 5·x - 3

10·x - 2·y = 7

The second equation can be rewritten in the slope and intercept form as follows;

y = 5 \cdot x -\dfrac{7}{2}

Therefore, the two equations are <u>parallel</u>

  • ║

3. The given equations are;

-2·x - 4·y = -8

-2·x + 4·y = -8

The given equations in slope and intercept form are;

y = 2 -\dfrac{1}{2}  \cdot x

Slope, m₁ = -\dfrac{1}{2}

y = \dfrac{1}{2}  \cdot x - 2

Slope, m₂ = \dfrac{1}{2}

The slopes

Therefore, m₁ ≠ m₂

m_1 \neq -\dfrac{1}{m_2}

The lines are <u>Neither</u> parallel nor perpendicular

  • <u>Neither</u>

4. The given equations are;

2·y - x = 2

y = \dfrac{1}{2} \cdot   x +1

m₁ = \dfrac{1}{2}

y = -2·x + 4

m₂ = -2

Therefore;

m_1 \neq -\dfrac{1}{m_2}

Therefore, the lines are <u>perpendicular</u>

  • ⊥

5. The given equations are;

4·y = 3·x + 12

-3·x + 4·y = 2

Which gives;

First equation, y = \dfrac{3}{4} \cdot x + 3

Second equation, y = \dfrac{3}{4} \cdot x + \dfrac{1}{2}

Therefore, m₁ = m₂, the lines are <u>parallel</u>

  • ║

6. The given equations are;

8·x - 4·y = 16

Which gives; y = 2·x - 4

5·y - 10 = 3, therefore, y = \dfrac{13}{5}

Therefore, the two equations are <u>neither</u> parallel nor perpendicular

  • <u>Neither</u>

7. The equations are;

2·x + 6·y = -3

Which gives y = -\dfrac{1}{3} \cdot x - \dfrac{1}{2}

12·y = 4·x + 20

Which gives

y = \dfrac{1}{3} \cdot x + \dfrac{5}{3}

m₁ ≠ m₂

m_1 \neq -\dfrac{1}{m_2}

  • <u>Neither</u>

8. 2·x - 5·y = -3

Which gives; y = \dfrac{2}{5} \cdot x +\dfrac{3}{5}

5·x + 27 = 6

x = -\dfrac{21}{5}

  • Therefore, the slopes are not equal, or perpendicular, the correct option is <u>Neither</u>

Learn more here:

brainly.com/question/16732089

You might be interested in
If r + 14 = -9, what justifies r = -23
kramer

Answer:

you subtract 14 from -9 and that justifies it

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A 21 foot beam is to be cut into three pieces so that the second and the third piece are each 3 times the length of the first pi
mylen [45]

x+3x+3x=21

7x=21

x=3

3, 9, 9=21

the answers are 3, 9, and 9

6 0
4 years ago
Slope 2 passing through 10,8
nlexa [21]
Use y=Mx+b    with x=10 and y=8
4 0
3 years ago
tensor-on-tensor regression: riemannian optimization, over-parameterization, statistical-computational gap and their interplay
Contact [7]

The purpose of the tensor-on-tensor regression, which we examine, is to relate tensor responses to tensor covariates with a low Tucker rank parameter tensor/matrix without being aware of its intrinsic rank beforehand.

By examining the impact of rank over-parameterization, we suggest the Riemannian Gradient Descent (RGD) and Riemannian Gauss-Newton (RGN) methods to address the problem of unknown rank. By demonstrating that RGD and RGN, respectively, converge linearly and quadratically to a statistically optimal estimate in both rank correctly-parameterized and over-parameterized scenarios, we offer the first convergence guarantee for the generic tensor-on-tensor regression. According to our theory, Riemannian optimization techniques automatically adjust to over-parameterization without requiring implementation changes.

Learn more about tensor-on-tensor here

brainly.com/question/16382372

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Are angles 1 and 2 a linear pair? Yes or no.
Lisa [10]
No because it doesn’t add up to 180°
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Pleasee someone answer
    12·1 answer
  • Which expression is equal to x + (f + g)?
    14·2 answers
  • What's 174/414 in simplest form
    6·2 answers
  • Without actually calculating the cubes, find the value of (16)^3+(-7)^3+(-9)^3
    14·2 answers
  • What percent of 126 is 22
    13·2 answers
  • Show all work to multiply quantity 3 plus the square root of negative 16 end quantity times quantity 6 minus the square root of
    14·2 answers
  • QUESTION 5 of 10: You have a choice of a $2,000 rebate on a $13,000 vehicle or 18% off. Which is better?
    8·1 answer
  • Please help !! i’m not quite getting what the equation can possibly be ? thank u !
    14·1 answer
  • Kevin correctly answered 75% of 32 test questions. How many questions did Kevin answer correctly? How many more questions would
    8·2 answers
  • Elena is trying to figure out how many movies she can download to her hard drive. The hard drive is supposed to hold 500 gigabyt
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!