Answer:
I hope following attachment will help you a lot!
Explanation:
57665554455555555rrtttyyyyuuiyt
Answer: Doctrine of ratification
Explanation:Doctrine of ratification tries to show that a person who is taking so much a time to complain has indicated that he agrees even if he doesn't without a written consent. This is to eliminate undue waste of time in business, legal an other proceedings requiring consent of both parties.
Doctrine of ratification can either be implied or expressed
Implied ratification is the type of ratification where a persons actions or body language can be seen that he has accepted.
Express ratification is a ratification where a person intentionally accept by showing either through written or verbally.
Answer:

Part A:
(-ve sign shows heat is getting out)
Part B:
(Heat getting in)
The value of Q at constant specific heat is approximately 361% in difference with variable specific heat and at constant specific heat Q has opposite direction (going in) than Q which is calculated in Part B from table A-23. So taking constant specific heat is not a good idea and is questionable.
Explanation:
Assumptions:
- Gas is ideal
- System is closed system.
- K.E and P.E is neglected
- Process is polytropic
Since Process is polytropic so 
Where n=1.25
Since Process is polytropic :


Now,


We will now calculate mass (m) and Temperature T_2.


Part A:
According to energy balance::

From A-20, C_v for Carbon dioxide at 300 K is 0.657 KJ/Kg.k

(-ve sign shows heat is getting out)
Part B:
From Table A-23:

(By interpolation)


(Heat getting in)
The value of Q at constant specific heat is approximately 361% in difference with variable specific heat and at constant specific heat Q has opposite direction (going in) than Q which is calculated in Part B from table A-23. So taking constant specific heat is not a good idea and is questionable.