1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MakcuM [25]
2 years ago
7

Why do we not consider the strong nuclear force when we describe the forces between atoms?

Physics
1 answer:
solong [7]2 years ago
3 0

This is because, nuclear forces are short range forces.

The protons and neutrons are collectively called nucleons and they are found in the nucleus of an atom. These nucleons are held together by a strong attractive force called the nuclear force.

When atoms combine, they are held together by forces determined by electrons in the outermost shell. The influence of the nuclear force does not extend beyond the nucleus because they are short range forces.

Hence, we not consider the strong nuclear force when we describe the forces between atoms.

Learn more:brainly.com/question/3964366

You might be interested in
The muscular system and the skeletal system of the human body work together to
AlladinOne [14]
 A. Allow movement.  
Muscles connect to your skeleton and they contract and move the skeleton along. <span>They help the process of movement happen in a smoother manner.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What net force would be necessary to cause a block of wood with a mass of 2.5 kg to accelerate at a rate of 3.0 m/s2
charle [14.2K]

Answer:

<h2>7.5 N</h2>

Explanation:

The force acting on an object given it's mass and acceleration can be found by using the formula

force = mass × acceleration

From the question

mass = 2.5 kg

acceleration = 3.0 m/s²

We have

force = 2.5 × 3.0 = 7.5

We have the final answer as

<h3>7.5 N</h3>

Hope this helps you

3 0
3 years ago
Which type of surface would most likely be the best reflector of electromagnetic energy?
Len [333]
<span>light colored and smooth surface would most likely be the best reflector of electromagnetic energy.Light, shiny surfaces are the best reflectors of radiation and they will allow the waves to reflect and bounce off rather than absorb. we can consider mirror as the example ,it will only reflect the light energy falling on them and it will not absorb. The darker coloured and rough surfaced substances will definitely absorb some amount of light falling on it. so light coloured smooth or shiny surfaced material would be the best reflector for electromagnetic energy.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
If an object has a mass of 38 kg, what is its approximate weight on earth?
klasskru [66]
38*10=380 N
To be more exact, 38 should be multiplied by 9.8 instead of 10.
3 0
3 years ago
Can a metallic sphere be charged without rubbing​
morpeh [17]
We need to charge a metal sphere positively without touching it. This can be achieved using electrostatic induction.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which two parameters can both be measured in meters
    15·2 answers
  • As the clump of colored fluid at the bottom of the lava lamp reaches the top, which has increased?
    9·2 answers
  • Kriste walks once around a large circle at a constant speed.
    5·1 answer
  • Two identical gliders on an air track are held together by a piece of string, compressing a spring between the gliders. While th
    11·1 answer
  • At baseball practice, Mason and Alfredo both picked up the same bat and neither would let go until one of them had it for himsel
    5·1 answer
  • Question number 11 how did we found the answer ?
    12·1 answer
  • The quantum theory of radiation reflects:
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone help me due at 1:00 PM plus 100 points <br><br>questions B,C,D
    12·2 answers
  • Hey can anyone please help me with this it’s due in few hours and I’m stuck with ittt
    6·1 answer
  • Que propiedad de la Luz se produce cuando ves tu cara reflejada en la cuchara?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!