All categories

3 years ago

What advantages do space telescopes have over Earth telescopes?

Physics

2 answers:

vampirchik [111]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

You don’t have to deal with the atmosphere of the earth. It points to the potential of the space program.

Explanation:

natulia [17]3 years ago

3 0

Devonshire Street telescopes how are earths telescopes that’s all me Siri you are I go to the store area

You might be interested in

Chemical weathering is greatest under conditions of

Pavel [41]

<h2>Answer: higher mean annual rainfall and temperatures. </h2>

Explanation:

Chemical weathering is the set of destructive processes through which rocky materials go trhough. These processes cause changes in the color, texture, composition, firmness and shape of the material.

It should be noted that this happens when the rocks come into contact with atmospheric agents such as oxygen and carbon dioxide.

Another important aspect is that rocks are able to break up more easily thanks to this type of weathering, since <u>the mineral grains within the rock lose adherence and dissolve better under the action of some physical agents</u>, such as <u>humidity (rainfall included) and temperature</u>.

Therefore:

Chemical weathering is greatest under conditions of <u>higher mean annual rainfall and temperatures. </u>

5 0

3 years ago

PLEAS HURRY :) 10 POINTS + BRAINLIEST TO FIRST CORRECT ANSWER

stiks02 [169]

Answer:

They conduct thermal energy from inside the house and release it outside the house. ... It reduces the amount of thermal energy that is transferred from outside to inside the container

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

7.) What is the relationship between kinetic and potential energy?

Arte-miy333 [17]

We know that potential energy is the energy that is stored within an object while kinetic energy is the energy that is in motion. The connection between the two is that potential energy transforms into kinetic energy

4 0

3 years ago

A block of mass m=2.20m=2.20 kg slides down a 30.0^{\circ}30.0

Xelga [282]

Answer:

$v_m \approx -4.38\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1}$ (moving toward the incline.)

$v_M \approx 4.02\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1}$ (moving away from the incline.)

(Assumption: $g = 9.81\; \rm m \cdot s^{-2}$ .)

Explanation:

If $g = 9.81\; \rm m \cdot s^{-2}$ , the potential energy of the block of $m = 2.20\; \rm kg$ would be $m \cdot g\cdot h = 2.20\; \rm kg \times 9.81\; \rm m \cdot s^{-2} \times 3.60\; \rm m \approx 77.695\; \rm J$ when it was at the top of the incline.

If friction is negligible, all these energies would be converted to kinetic energy when this block reaches the bottom of the incline. There shouldn't be any energy loss along the horizontal surface, either. Therefore, the kinetic energy of this $m = 2.20\; \rm kg\!$ block right before the collision would also be approximately $77.695\; \rm J$ .

Calculate the velocity of that $m = 2.20\; \rm kg$ based on its kinetic energy:

$\displaystyle v_m(\text{initial}) = \sqrt{\frac{2\times (\text{Kinetic Energy})}{m}} \approx \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 77.695\; \rm J}{2.20\; \rm kg}} \approx 8.4043\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1}}$ .

A collision is considered as an elastic collision if both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved.

Initial momentum of the two blocks:

$p_m = m \cdot v_m(\text{initial}) \approx 2.20\; \rm kg \times 8.4043\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1} \approx 18.489\; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1}$ .

$p_M = M \cdot v_M(\text{initial}) \approx 2.20\; \rm kg \times 0\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1} \approx 0\; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1}$ .

Sum of the momentum of each block right before the collision: approximately $18.489\; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1}$ .

Sum of the momentum of each block right after the collision: $(m\cdot v_m + m \cdot v_M)$ .

For momentum to conserve in this collision, $v_m$ and $v_M$ should ensure that $m\cdot v_m + m \cdot v_M \approx 18.489\; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1}$ .

Kinetic energy of the two blocks right before the collision: approximately $77.695\; \rm J$ and $0\; \rm J$ . Sum of these two values: approximately $77.695\; \rm J\!$ .

Sum of the energy of each block right after the collision:

$\displaystyle \left(\frac{1}{2}\, m \cdot {v_m}^2 + \frac{1}{2}\, M \cdot {v_M}^2\right)$ .

Similarly, for kinetic energy to conserve in this collision, $v_m$ and $v_M$ should ensure that $\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\, m \cdot {v_m}^2 + \frac{1}{2}\, M \cdot {v_M}^2 \approx 77.695\; \rm J$ .

Combine to obtain two equations about $v_m$ and $v_M$ (given that $m = 2.20\; \rm kg$ whereas $M = 7.00\; \rm kg$ .)

$\left\lbrace\begin{aligned}& m\cdot v_m + m \cdot v_M \approx 18.489\; \rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1} \\ & \frac{1}{2}\, m \cdot {v_m}^2 + \frac{1}{2}\, M \cdot {v_M}^2 \approx 77.695\; \rm J\end{aligned}\right.$ .

Solve for $v_m$ and $v_M$ (ignore the root where $v_M = 0$ .)

$\left\lbrace\begin{aligned}& v_m \approx -4.38\; \rm m\cdot s^{-1} \\ & v_M \approx 4.02\; \rm m \cdot s^{-1}\end{aligned}\right.$ .

The collision flipped the sign of the velocity of the $m = 2.20\; \rm kg$ block. In other words, this block is moving backwards towards the incline after the collision.

6 0

2 years ago

How does a rubber rod become negatively charged through friction?

Artist 52 [7]

Thank you for posting your question here and Brainly!~

Even though you have not provided answer choices, I believe the answer is whatever letter corresponds with the answer: "It is rubbed with another object, and electrons move onto the rod."

Hope I helped!~ Brainliest appreciated.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers