Answer:
Assume that the sack was initially close to the sea level. Its weight will increase even though its mass stays the same.
Explanation:
The weight of an object typically refers to the size of the planet's gravitational attraction (a force) on this object. That's not the same as the mass of the object. The weight of an object at a position depends on the size of the gravitational field there; on the other hand, the mass of the object is supposed to be same regardless of the location- as long as the object stays intact.
Let
denote the strength of the gravitational field at a certain point. If the mass of an object is
, its weight at that point will be
.
Indeed,
on many places of the earth. However, this value is accurate only near the sea level. The equation for universal gravitation is a more general way for finding the strength of the gravitational field at an arbitrary height. Let
denote the constant of universal gravitation, and let
denote the mass of the earth. At a distance
from the center of the earth (where
.
The elevation of many places in Bhutan are significantly higher than that of many places in India. Therefore, a sack of potato in Bhutan will likely be further away from the center of the earth (larger
) compared to a sack of potato in India.
Note, that in the approximation, the value of
is (approximately, because the earth isn't perfectly spherical) inversely proportional to the distance from the center of the planet. The gravitational field strength
On the other hand, the weight of an object of fixed mass is proportional to the gravitational field strength. Therefore, the same bag of potatoes will have a smaller weight at most places in Bhutan compared to most places in India.
Answer:
The correct answer is "obligatory water reabsorption in the proximal convoluted tubule".
Explanation:
The mechanism for producing concentrated urine cannot include the obligatory reabsorption of water in the proximal convoluted tubule since this process is part of the nephron, the system that filters the blood. Glucose and amino acids are reabsorbed almost entirely, as are approximately 70% of filtered potassium and 80% of bicarbonate.
Have a nice day!
Complete Question
The complete question is shown on the first uploaded image
Answer:
The concentration of
that should used originally is 
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The necessary elementary step is

The time taken for sixth of 0.5 M of reactant to react 
The time available is 
The desired concentration to remain
Let Z be the reactant , Y be the first product and X the second product
Generally the elementary rate law is mathematically as

Where k is the rate constant ,
is the concentration of Z
From the elementary rate law we see that the reaction is second order (This because the concentration of the reactant is raised to power 2 )
For second order reaction

Where
is the initial concentration of Z which a value of 
From the question we are told that it take 9 hours for the concentration of the reactant to become


So


=> 
For 





Answer:
The rate of leakage will be higher for helium; its molecules move about 3 times faster than oxygen’s
Explanation:
Step 1: Data given
Molar mass helium = 4.0 g/mol
Molar mass O2 = 32 g/mol
Step 2: Graham's law
Graham's Law of Effusion states that the rate of effusion of a gas is inversely proportional to the square root of the molecular mass : 1/(Mr)^0.5
Rate of escape for He = 1/(4.0)^0.5 = 0.5
Rate of escape for O2 = 1/(32)^0.5 = 0.177
The rate of leakage will be higher for helium; its molecules move about 3 times faster than oxygen’s