The equation to find force is f=ma. So, if you plug in the information that you have you'll get F=5x3 and that'll equal F=15N
Answer:
Solution is in explanation
Explanation:
part a)
For normalization we have
![\int_{0}^{\infty }f(x)dx=1\\\\\therefore \int_{0}^{\infty }ae^{-kx}dx=1\\\\\Rightarrow a\int_{0}^{\infty }e^{-kx}dx=1\\\\\frac{a}{-k}[\frac{1}{e^{kx}}]_{0}^{\infty }=1\\\\\frac{a}{-k}[0-1]=1\\\\\therefore a=k](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%20%7Df%28x%29dx%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Ctherefore%20%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%20%7Dae%5E%7B-kx%7Ddx%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20a%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%20%7De%5E%7B-kx%7Ddx%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7B-k%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Be%5E%7Bkx%7D%7D%5D_%7B0%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%20%7D%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7B-k%7D%5B0-1%5D%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Ctherefore%20a%3Dk)
Part b)
![\int_{0}^{L }f(x)dx=1\\\\\therefore Re(\int_{0}^{L }ae^{-ikx}dx)=1\\\\\Rightarrow Re(a\int_{0}^{L }e^{-ikx}dx)=1\\\\\therefore Re(\frac{a}{-ik}[\frac{1}{e^{ikx}}]_{0}^{L})=1\\\\\Rightarrow Re(\frac{a}{-ik}(e^{-ikL}-1))=1\\\\\frac{a}{k}Re(\frac{1}{-i}(cos(-kL)+isin(-kL)-1))=1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7BL%20%7Df%28x%29dx%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Ctherefore%20Re%28%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7BL%20%7Dae%5E%7B-ikx%7Ddx%29%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20Re%28a%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7BL%20%7De%5E%7B-ikx%7Ddx%29%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Ctherefore%20Re%28%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7B-ik%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Be%5E%7Bikx%7D%7D%5D_%7B0%7D%5E%7BL%7D%29%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CRightarrow%20Re%28%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7B-ik%7D%28e%5E%7B-ikL%7D-1%29%29%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7Bk%7DRe%28%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B-i%7D%28cos%28-kL%29%2Bisin%28-kL%29-1%29%29%3D1)

The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice or letter B.
<span>A satellite (s) is moving in an elliptical orbit around the earth has its angular momentum towards the earth changing in direction, but not in magnitude.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
a
Explanation:
it explains the most, and it is the correct theorem
Answer:
Explanation:
One of the major differences between nuclear reactions and chemical reactions is that nuclear reactions involve larger amount of energy than chemical energy. <u>This is because the force between the protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom is much higher than the force of attraction between electrons and the positively charged nucleus, hence nuclear reactions involves/requires a larger amount of energy (because it's reactions involve the nucleus) than chemical reactions (because it's reactions involve the electrons)</u>.
Thus, during nuclear fusion, two light nuclei are bombarded against one another to produce a larger/heavier nuclei with the release of large amount of energy (because the forces between the protons and neutrons are much higher) unlike when two atoms/molecules are chemically combined together to form a new molecule with the rearrangement of electrons in the valence shells of the participating molecules.