An object is at rest. There are several forces acting on the object, but the net force is zero. If all the

1 answer:

3 0

It would not. Imagine four forces equal in magnitude but opposite in direction (e.g. north, east, south, and west). If these forces were to double in magnitude they would still have the same magnitude, meaning the net force is still equal to zero.

You might be interested in

What are the limitations of using solar panels?

umka21 [38]

Location & Sunlight Availability.
Solar Panels use a large amount of space.
The Sun isn't always present.
Solar Energy is Inefficient.
There is an overlooked Pollution & Environmental Impact.
Expensive Energy Storage.
High Initial Cost.

8 0

2 years ago

What is the changing of the position of an object relative to a point of reference

Bond [772]

The displacement ........................

5 0

3 years ago

A magnetically soft material is placed in a strong magnetic field. What is the most likely outcome?

MakcuM [25]

Answer:

It will become a temporary magnet because the domains will easily realign.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Simon is riding a bike at 12 km/h away from his friend Keesha.He throws a ball at 5 km/h back to Keesha, who is standing still o

Tems11 [23]

I notice that even though we're working with frames of reference
here, you never said which frame the '5 km/hr' is measured in.

In fact ! You didn't even say which frame the '12 km/hr' of his
bike is measured in.

So there are several different ways this could go. I'll do it the way
I THINK you meant it, but that doesn't guarantee anything.

-- Simon is riding his bike at 12 km/hr relative to the sidewalk,
away from Keesha.

-- He throws a ball at Keesha, at 5 km/hr relative to his own face.

-- Keesha sees the ball approaching her at (12 - 5) = 7 km/hr
relative to the ground and to her.

5 0

3 years ago

How do I do this physics problem about potential energy and kinetic energy?

larisa86 [58]

Ok i apologise for the messy working but I'll try and explain my attempt at logic

Also note i ignore any air resistance for this.

First i wrote the two equations I'd most likely need for this situation, the kinetic energy equation and the potential energy equation.

Because the energy right at the top of the swing motion is equal to the energy right in the "bottom" of the swing's motion (due to conservation of energy), i made the kinetic energy equal to the potential energy as indicated by Ek = Ep.

I also noted the "initial" and "final" height of the swing with hi and hf respectively.

So initially looking at this i thought, what the heck, there's no mass. Then i figured that using the conservation of energy law i could take the mass value from the Ek equation and use it in the Ep equation. So what i did was take the Ek equation and rearranged it for m as you can hopefully see. Then i substituted the rearranged Ek equation into the Ep equation.

So then the equation reads something like Ep = (rearranged Ek equation for m) × g (which is -9.81) × change in height (hf - hi).

Then i simplify the equation a little. When i multiply both sides by v^2 i can clearly see that there is one E on each side (at that stage i don't need to clarify which type of energy it is because Ek = Ep so they're just the same anyway). So i just canceled them out and square rooted both sides.

The answer i got was that the max velocity would be 4.85m/s 3sf, assuming no losses (eg energy lost to friction).

I do hope I'm right and i suppose it's better than a blank piece of paper good luck my dude xx

4 0

3 years ago