1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
omeli [17]
2 years ago
7

What is the basis for Verizon’s lawsuit against the Federal Communications Commission? Why did it claim a violation of free spee

ch?
Law
1 answer:
Digiron [165]2 years ago
7 0
Correct a few minutes later lol lol I’m
You might be interested in
does anyone have PLATO Course Principles of Law, Public Safety, Corrections, and Security, Semester A i need help on the third s
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

Whats your question?

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following cases established testimony by expert witness?
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

Explanation:

Judge is the gatekeeper

The judge is to decide whether the expert is qualified to deliver reliable testimony and whether the expert's report is sufficiently reliable to be helpful to the Trier of Fact.

Rule 702 Testimony by Experts

1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data

2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods.

The Supreme Court identified four tests that can be used by the gatekeeper-judge to determine whether to admit the expert testimony. It is typically understood that it is not necessary for the expert testimony to pass all four tests.

1) Tested - Whether the theory or technique used by the expert can be, and has been, tested

2) Peer Review - Whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication

3) Error Rate - The known or potential rate of error of the method used is known or predictable

4) General Acceptance - The degree of the method's or conclusion's acceptance within the relevant scientific community

Review of five court cases

1) Frye v. United States - 1923 - established the "general acceptance" principle

2) Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 702 - 1975 - established the rule for "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" expert witness testimony

3) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals - 1993 - established the four-part Daubert test for evaluating expert testimony

4) GE v. Joiner - 1997 - confirmed the trial judge's gatekeeper role

5) Kumho Tire v. Carmichael - 1999 - expanded the Daubert tests to apply to all disciplines

United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land

A good example of the application of the Daubert Test.

This is a rare case where the appellate court overruled the trial judge's gatekeeper role.

Gatekeeper is not intended to serve as a replacement for the adversary system: Vigorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence.

Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding. In other words, the purpose is to make the process more efficient.

The report must contain:

(i) a complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and reasons for them;

(ii) the data or other information considered by the witness in forming them;

(iii) any exhibits that will be used to summarize or support them;

(iv) the witness's qualifications, including a list of all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

(v) a list of all other cases in which, during the previous 4 years, the witness testified as an expert at trial or by deposition; and

(vi) a statement of the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony in the case.

That written report must contain, at a minimum, six items:

1) All opinions the witness will express and their foundation and reasoning;

2) Data and information considered by the witness;

3) Any exhibits that will be used while giving the testimony in court;

4) Witness qualifications, including all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

5) List of all other cases in the last four years where testimony was given as an expert at trial or deposition;

6) Description of the compensation for the study and testimony.

An appraisal report may need to be quite detailed. This may be at odds with the request of retaining counsel, who may want a less detailed report.

Report should include any exhibits which the witness anticipates using as "demonstrative evidence" during testimony.

report should include a statement of publications and testimony for the prescribed periods.

Some items of interest in this Rule are:

1 - If an objection is raised by one of the attorneys, the deponent will still be required to provide an answer, but that answer will be subject to approval by the court after hearing the objection.

2 - The deponent may refuse to answer a question only when it is necessary to preserve a privilege, enforce a limitation directly by the court, or present a motion under Rule 30(d)(4).

3 - The maximum time limit for a deposition is one day of seven hours.

4 - The deponent has the right to review and correct the transcript. He or she will have 30 days after receiving the transcript to review and submit corrections. However, this right must be affirmed and requested during the deposition. It is recommended that the appraiser expert always request this right to review and correct, as it will provide the appraiser with a copy of the transcript of the "oral report" for his or her workfile.

Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

The time limit to respond is 30 days from the date of service of the interrogatories.

6 0
3 years ago
What type of law regulates government bureaucracies?
SIZIF [17.4K]
The answer is choice d
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What terms describes contract damages set by a clause within the contract itself?
puteri [66]

Answer:

Liquidated damages is the clause that is included in a contract to determine damages if a party was to breach the contract.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Frank got the opportunity to assist one of the best chefs in the United States, one who ignored his criminal past and appreciate
defon

Most because getting out of jail/prison don't really know what to do with themselves after leaving because it's hard for them to adjust your life choices. most places of work won't hire you and it becomes harder to do stuff like buy a house or apartment. so most people do what they did best before prison. Do illegal business

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need to write an apology cuz i prank called a pizza place to my friends house and they told my parents i was wondering if this
    12·2 answers
  • Two neighbors who live on an army base have a dispute that involves one of the neighbors accusing the other of breaking a law.
    14·2 answers
  • Plsss help with this question I’ll mark u as brainlist
    6·1 answer
  • A ____ involves giving a selection of small pictures of faces to eyewitnesses for the purpose of identifying a perpetrator.
    14·1 answer
  • What factors are used to determine probable cause?
    14·1 answer
  • A surgeon made a mistake during a complicated operation that led to
    7·2 answers
  • 15 A search warrant can force someone to have surgery to retrieve a bullet as long as probable cause exists. QA True B. False Re
    15·1 answer
  • What does money laundering accomplish
    9·1 answer
  • Why are you rip offs
    6·2 answers
  • What are your thoughts on this interview? Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland S
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!